Page 397 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 397

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: NONLINEAR AND CHAOTIC DYNAMICS          373

              the pipe-strip  bond and even the pipe as a whole. More successful was the use of  plate
              guides confining the motion to a plane. Under these circumstances the motion did become
              chaotic in any case.
                The  route  to  chaos  is  not  clear  from  the  experimental  data.  It  could  be  via
              quasiperiodicity - see  Section 5.8.3(b);  however,  in  at  least  one  case,  a  sequence of
              two period doublings was observed to precede chaos.
                Finally, the case of  p = 0 does appear to be singular, in that no secondary bifurcation
              arises. The motion remains periodic to the maximum flow available - a conclusion also
              reached by  Copeland & Moon (1992).
                In  the  theoretical study of  the  system, equation (5.28) or  (5.39) is  used, rather than
              (5.42) and (5.43), so that inertial nonlinearities are left intact and no restriction on their
              magnitude needs  be  imposed. Of  course, equation (5.28) needs be  modified to  include
              the effect of the end-mass, which is twofold: (i) the inertial terms now involve m + M  +
              Ah(x - L), where A is the end-mass; (ii) the gravity-induced tension terms are similarly
              modified. Hence, with U  = 0, the dimensionless equations are




                               f y[l + ph(6 - l)]ql + 2ufili’  + q”ll + N(q) = 0   (5.140)

              where





                         1111  12
                      + rl   q  + 4q’q’’q’’’ + q”3 + q’[l + pS(6 - l)]





                                                                                  (5.141)

              p  is defined by  (5.139). Thus, via the use of  the Dirac delta function, the effect of  p is
              incorporated in  the equation of  motion, while the boundary conditions remain the same
              as for  p = 0.’  This  facilitates the discretization of  the  system, via Galerkin’s method.
              As discussed in Section 5.4, care has to be exercised in  selecting appropriate numerical
              methods for the solution of  the resultant N  second-order ordinary differential equations,
              because of  the  presence  of  the  nonlinear inertial terms - methods which  should  give
              accurate, convergent solutions. The finite difference (FDM) and the incremental harmonic
              balance (IHB) methods have been  found to be particularly efficient and complementary
              (Semler et al. 1996).
                Typical results are shown in Figure 5.46; they are seen to be sensibly the same whether
              computed with N  = 3 or 4 in the Galerkin discretization. In (a) it is seen that, for p = 0,
              the  theory also finds no bifurcation beyond the Hopf  bifurcation at  u 2 6.2. The Hopf
              bifurcation is clearly supercritical, in contrast to the experimental results.

                ‘The  appropriateness of this formulation and method of solution is demonstrated at the end of  Section 4.6.2.
   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402