Page 337 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 337

1656_C007.fm  Page 317  Monday, May 23, 2005  5:54 PM





                       Fracture Toughness Testing of Metals                                        317


                       governed by the size and geometry of the cracked body. In a laboratory specimen under load control,
                       for example, K  would correspond to P max  in a Type I load-displacement curve (Figure 7.13). Such
                                   c
                       a K  value would exhibit a size dependence similar to that observed for K  based on a 2% crack
                         c
                                                                                   Q
                       growth criterion, as Figure 7.17 illustrates. Consequently,  K  values obtained from laboratory
                                                                         c
                       specimens are not usually transferable to structures.
                       7.3.1 SPECIMEN DESIGN

                       The ASTM standard for K-R curve testing [14] permits three configurations of test specimens: the
                       middle tension (MT) geometry, the conventional compact specimen, and a wedge-loaded compact
                       specimen. The latter configuration, which is similar to the compact crack-arrest specimen discussed
                       in Section 7.6, is the most stable of the three specimen types, and thus is suitable for materials
                       with relatively flat R curves.
                          Since this test method is often applied to thin sheets, specimens do not usually have the
                       conventional geometry, with the width equal to twice the thickness. The specimen thickness is
                       normally fixed by the sheet thickness, and the width is governed by the anticipated toughness of
                       the material, as well as the available test fixtures.
                          A modified nomenclature is applied to thin-sheet compact specimens. For example, a specimen
                       with W = 50 mm (2 in.) is designated as a 1T plan specimen, since the in-plane dimensions correspond
                       to the conventional 1T compact geometry. Standard fixtures can be used to test thin-sheet compact
                       specimens, provided the specimens are fitted with spacers, as illustrated in Figure 7.20.
                          One problem with thin sheet fracture toughness testing is that the specimens are subject to out-
                       of-plane buckling, which leads to combined Mode I–Mode III loading of the crack. Consequently,
                       an antibuckling device should be fitted to the specimen. Figure 7.20 illustrates a typical antibuckling
                       fixture for thin-sheet compact specimens. Plates on either side of the specimen prevent out-of-plane
                       displacements. These plates should not be bolted too tightly together, because loads applied by the
                       test machine should be carried by the specimen rather than the antibuckling plates. Some type of
                       lubricant (e.g., Teflon sheet) is usually required to allow the specimen to slide freely through the
                       two plates during the test.































                       FIGURE 7.20  Antibuckling fixtures for testing thin compact specimens.
   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342