Page 170 - Fundamentals of Magnetic Thermonuclear Reactor Design
P. 170

Superconducting Magnet Systems  Chapter | 5    151


             pure titanium jackets and 0.5% for SCs using 316LN austenitic stainless-steel
             jackets. These materials were used to jacket the SC cables of model coils, with
             Incoloy being a material of choice for the CSMC, titanium for the TFCI, and
             stainless steel for TFMC. Test results disclose the inadequacy of the linear
             elasticity model for assessing the relative strain of the Nb Sn strands in cable
                                                            3
             twists, and the ambiguity of the ‘advantages,’ the complexity of the techniques
             and the increased risk of Incoloy’s and titanium’s practical application in the
             MC of ITER scale. As a result, only 316LN stainless steel was chosen and
             included in the ITER design specifications as a jacket material of the TFC and
             CS conductors.
                During the model coil testing, the T  and temperature margin  T∆=  T CS  −  T                          ∆T=TCS−T 0
                                                                           0
                                            CS
             consistently declined (‘degraded’) with increasing number of load cycles
             (Fig. 5.27).
                This effect was observed in all model coils with Nb Sn conductors, ex-
                                                            3
             cluding the TFCI, in which  T  was at the test beginning lower than the                                   TCS
                                       CS
             design value by ∼1.5 K, but remained unchanged later. When design loads
             were at their highest, the T  degradation in the CSMC, TFMC and CSCI was
                                   CS
             ∼1 K. In addition, the model coils demonstrated a two- to three-fold decrease
             in the n- and m-factors of the superconducting cable’s VAC and VTC rela-
             tive to the ‘initial’ strands. Nothing like that was observed in the TFCI tests
             [11,14,15].
                After the TFCI testing, the Efremov Institute (SPb, Russia) carried out a
             non-destructive examination of this SС insert to understand why the behav-
             iour of one and the same SC was different for different coils [16]. The exami-
             nation was performed by X-ray introscopy (with respect to the turns and force


























             FIGURE 5.27  CSCI testing, the cycling (40 kA; 13 T). The evolution of the current sharing
             temperature (T CS ) with increasing number of load cycles .
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175