Page 151 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 151

106                            Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes: Physical, Chemical, and Biological



            6.5 FLOCCULENT SUSPENSIONS (TYPE II)
                                                               TABLE 6.3
            Flocculation occurs when particles collide and attach to each  Results of Settling Column Test for Type II Suspension
            other thus increasing in size. As such, particles collide during
                                                                                Suspended Solids Concentration (mg=L)
            settling and grow in size as they settle at an increasingly
            higher rate, i.e., proportional to the diameter squared, per  Liquid Depth    Time (min)
            Stokes’ law, Equation 6.6.                         (m)    (ft)  0    10  30   50  80   110  140   170
              Figure 6.13 shows the paths of two particles, designated
                                                               0.61   2.0   100  84  60   23   0    0    0    0
            ‘‘1’’ and ‘‘2’’ in a horizontal flow-settling basin, with horizon-
                                                               1.22   4.0   100  91  72   50  22    0    0    0
            tal velocity v H . For each particle, the initial fall velocities are
                                                               1.83   6.0   100  93  79   64  37   13    0    0
            v 1 and v 2 , respectively. As the particles grow in size along
                                                               2.44   8.0   100  95  83   70  47   24    7    0
            their mean trajectories, their fall velocities increase corres-
                                                               3.05   10.0  100  95  85   73  52   33    15   0
            pondingly, causing a changing resultant velocity vector and
            consequently curved paths.                         Note: Data are hypothetical.
              Inspecting Figure 6.13 shows that size 1 particles will be
            100% removed. For the size 2 particles starting at position d 2
            above the bottom, the particles reaches the bottom in length, L.
            This means that all size 2 particles below d 2 will be removed  tions, i.e., depth is the ordinate, with origin at the top, and
            and those above will leave the basin. The removal of the size  time is the abscissa. From the plotted numerical data, iso-
            2 particles is thus (d 2 =D)   DP 2 .              percent removal lines were drawn, which are the same as the
              Looking further at Figure 6.13, suppose that 60% of the  trajectories of particles of different sizes, as noted previously.
            particles have fall velocities higher than ‘‘1,’’ then the trajec-
            tory of ‘‘1,’’ starting at 0 depth, is also the 60% removal line.  6.5.2 DETERMINING PERCENT REMOVALS
            Now suppose 70% of the particles have fall velocities higher
            than ‘‘2,’’ then the trajectory of particle ‘‘2’’ at 0 depth is  Several points are pertinent to Figure 6.14:
            also the 70% removal line. As another means of looking at the
            trajectories of different particles, consider conducting a  1. The iso-percent removal lines represent the settling
            settling test in a quiescent cylinder and moving the column  paths of particular particle sizes, as discussed with
            along the length of the basin at velocity, v H . The concepts are  respect to Figure 6.13.
            the same as for discrete particle settling, except that flocculent  2. Consider the 30% line. At any point along the 30%
            particles settle with increasing velocity.              removal line, 30% of the suspension will have been
                                                                    removed.
                                                                  3. At any point along the 30% line, the average settling
            6.5.1 SETTLING TEST FOR A FLOCCULENT SUSPENSION
                                                                    velocity can be calculated, and the detention time is a
            Results from a hypothetical settling test of a flocculent sus-  coordinate.
            pension are shown in Table 6.3; the column depth is 3.35 m
            (11 ft). The data are concentrations and can be converted to  To illustrate the calculation of settling velocities, the third
            percent removal by subtracting the values given from 100.  point, consider the coordinate point (3.00 m, 54 min) [(9.84 ft,
            The percent removals, as calculated from Table 6.3, are  54 min)]. The average velocity, v s , of particles removed was
            recorded in Figure 6.14 using the respective coordinate posi-  v s ¼ 3.00 m=54 min ¼ 0.055 m=min ¼ 0.00092 m=s(v s ¼ 9.84 ft=
                                                               54 min ¼ 0.18 ft=min). All particles having a settling velocity
                                                               equal to or greater than v s ¼ 0.055 m=min (0.18 ft=min) will be
                                                               removed.
                       v H                                        Particles with lower velocities than v s will be removed in
                                                               proportion to d=D (or v s =v o ); to illustrate, consider the 30%–
              v 1                         r(d )= d /D ΔP 2    40% removal increment at D(30–40 average) ¼ 2.4 m, t ¼ 54
                                               2
                                            2
                                                               min. The average settling velocity is v s ¼ 2.4 m=54
              v 2                                       d
                                            2            2     min ¼ 0.044 m=min (v s ¼ 7.87 ft=54 min ¼ 0.146 ft=min).
                                                           D
                                            1                  Therefore, the increment of removal is 0.044 m=min=0.055
            d 2
                                                               m=min)   10% (or 0.15=0.18   10%) to equal 8%. The next
                                                               10% increment is handled in the same way. At this point, it
                                                               should be noted that because the times are the same, the
                                 L                             depth ratio is the same as the velocities ratio. From this, a more
                                                               general algebraic expression can be obtained for percent
            FIGURE 6.13  Illustration of flocculent settling for size 1 and size 2  removal from a horizontal flow basin (see also WPCF,
            particles.                                         1985, p. 11):
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156