Page 160 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 160

Sedimentation                                                                                    115



              5. Solids contact basins in which the coagulated water            Launder              Effluent
                 passes through a blanket of solids, i.e., a chemical  Inlet
                 floc
              6. Flotation basins (Chapter 8)
              7. Innovative technologies
                 a. Actiflowt process is an example in which sand is
                   attached by polymers to the flocculent material.
                   The higher specific gravity material incorporated
                   into the floc results in a markedly higher gravity               Solids  removal equipment
                   force and thus higher fall velocity.
              8. Suspension category:
                 a. Discrete particle                                        Solids removal
                 b. Flocculent particle
                                                               FIGURE 6.21  Up-flow sedimentation basin. (Adapted from Katz,
                 c. Hindered
                                                               W.J. et al., Concepts of Sedimentation Applied to Design, Part 2,
                 d. Compression
                                                               Water and Sewage Works, 169, May 1962b.)
                 e. Oil–water separations
                                                               settling zone. A hydraulic roll characterizes the settling zone,
            With these different kinds of settling basins, the same funda-
                                                               i.e., the associated velocity vectors are horizontal along the
            mentals apply. To reiterate, these are (1) characteristics of the
                                                               bottom, up toward the overflow launders, and then along the
            suspension and (2) the hydraulics of the basin.
                                                               top and back toward the entrance.
                                                               6.8.2.2  Up-Flow
            6.8.2 EXAMPLES OF DESIGNS
                                                               Figure 6.21 illustrates the idea of an up-flow basin. The plan
            Design practice encompasses a wide range of basin types,  area is covered with launders, which forces the flow vertically
            geometry, suspensions, and parameter values. Data on pri-  upward, over the weirs. The basin is fitted with the same
            mary wastewater basins are given for reference (as adapted  appurtenances as the horizontal flow basin. The upward vel-
            from ASCE-WPCF (1959); used and cited by Nemerow   ocity, v o , is set as the overflow velocity and so there is no
            (1971) and Nemerow and Agardy (1998)). In addition, guide-  partial removal of particles in which v s < v o . The up-flow
            lines are compiled from various sources for design of basins  basin circumvents many of the hydraulic problems of hori-
            for the four suspension types.                     zontal-flow basins.

            6.8.2.1  Horizontal Flow                           6.8.2.3  Data from Real Basins
            The traditional design is the horizontal flow rectangular basin,  Tables 6.7 and 6.8 show flows, dimensions, u and v o , sus-
            conceptually like the ideal basin as illustrated in Figure 6.8 for  pended solids, and BOD data for rectangular and circular
            a real basin, however, appurtenances must be added for inlet  primary settling basins, respectively. Comparing these char-
            water distribution, for outlet flow, and for sludge removal.  acteristics shows a wide range for each of the two basin types.
                                                                                            3
            Figure 6.20 is a sketch that depicts a real basin showing the  Flow per basin is as low as 0.0033 m =s (0.07 mgd) and as high
                                                                       3
            inlet, outlet, solids scraping equipment, solids storage, and  as 4.3 m =s (12 mgd) for rectangular basins. Depths varied
                                                               2.4–4.6 m (8–15 ft), while lengths were up to 82 m (270 ft),
                                                     Effluent  with widths 3.7–36 m (12–117 ft) and u ranged 1.0–5.1 h.
                                                                                                              2
                Inlet                                          Overflow velocity ranged 0.76–3.75 m=h(450–2210 gpd=ft ).
                                                               Inspecting removals, the 67% suspended solids removal and
                                                               33% BOD removal for primary settling basins, the rule of
                                   Settling zone               thumb (for removals) from lore, appears to be corroborated.
                                                               Despite the problems inherent to circular basins, they appear
                                                               to perform about the same as the rectangular basins, as seen
                                                               by comparing the removals in Tables 6.7 and 6.8.
                                  Solids removal equipment
                                                               6.8.3 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA FOR DESIGN
                                                               Design parameters for settling basins include detention time, u,
                                                               overflow velocity, v o , solids loading rate, horizontal velocity,
                          Solids removal
                                                               v H , weir loading rate, Q=L(weir), and depth (WPCF, 1985,
            FIGURE 6.20  Conventional rectangular settling basin illustrating  p. 4). Also, w=L,and L=D should be included. As seen, practice
            hydraulic roll. (Adapted from Katz, W.J. et al., Concepts of Sedi-  encompasses a wide variation in the foregoing parameters as do
            mentation Applied to Design, Part 2, Water and Sewage Works, 169,  the guidelines abstracted from the literature and summarized in
            May 1962b.)                                        Tables 6.9 through 6.11.
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165