Page 161 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 161

116                            Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes: Physical, Chemical, and Biological


                                 R(BOD)  (%)  42  39  48  22  39  34  48  22  25  28  30  29  45  33  57  41  23  68  33  31  37  51  50  Control  and  N.L.



                                 BOD in  (mg=L)  240  153  133  169  128  231  102  134  206  127  113  98  185  253  106  256  133  201  166  228  183  190  242  Pollution  Nemerow,
                                                                                             Water
                                 R(SS)  (%)  61  44  67  39  55  61  48  16  30  31  48  39  63  40  69  66  40  76  54  50  69  67  54  and  1971;  MA,


                                 SS in  (mg=L)  173  184  149  152  137  409  138  193  273  139  140  237  153  577  250  358  159  445  144  242  215  230  212  Engineers  Reading,


                                Flow  (gpd=ft)  56,800  408,000  106,500  284,000  215,000  94,500  100,000  118,000  24,000  35,500  97,000  44,430  46,000  214,000  27,200  24,000  25,000  23,700  14,500  20,400  17,300  120,000  12,500  Civil  of  Addison-Wesley,



                                Weir  (m 3 =h=m)  29.39  211.11  55.10  146.95  111.24  48.90  51.74  61.06  12.42  18.37  50.19  22.99  23.80  110.73  14.07  12.42  12.94  12.26  7.50  10.56  8.95  62.09  6.47  Society American



                                   (gpd=ft 2 )  450  1650  760  2210  1670  1890  755  1470  1800  930  1300  855  1200  1430  362  1080  993  735  660  619  455  1010  187  8,  No.  Treatment,

                                v o                                                          Practice  and
                                   (m=h)  0.764  2.801  1.290  3.752  2.835  3.208  1.282  2.495  3.056  1.579  2.207  1.451  2.037  2.428  0.615  1.833  1.686  1.248  1.120  1.051  0.772  1.715  0.317  of  Practices,


                                 u  (h)  3.53  1.41  2.48  0.98  1.25  1.25  2.49  1.22  1.32  2.16  1.70  2.02  1.49  1.33  1.86  2.00  2.64  2.45  2.71  2.91  5.12  1.87  7.18  Manual  Theories,  1998.  York,

                                   L=D  11.4  20.8  13.3  10.3  10.7  7.7  12.7  6.7  9  13.5  14  5  10  11.7  8.3  15  6.5  8.7  21.2  8.5  13.1  11.4  16.7  WPCF  New
                                                                                             36,  Industry,
                                   L=w  1.5  2.3  3.5  2.5  2.5  3.3  4.1  2.2  7.5  2.4  1.5  3.6  6.5  3.9  5.4  3.6  5.9  5.5  6.4  2.5  4.2  3.8  3.9  No.  of  Reinhold,

                                   (ft)  9  13  10  12  12  13  10  10  13  12  12  10  10  11  9  12  14  10  10  10  13  10  8  Practice  Wastes
                                D                                                                Nostrand
                                   (m)  2.74  3.96  3.05  3.66  3.66  3.96  3.05  3.05  3.96  3.66  3.66  3.05  3.05  3.35  2.74  3.66  4.27  3.05  3.05  3.05  3.96  3.05  2.44  of  Liquid

                                   (ft)  68  117  40  52  50  33  32  31  16  67  109  14  15  32  14  50  16  16  33  33  40  32  32  Manual  N.L.,  Van
                                w
                                   (m)  20.7  35.7  12.2  15.8  15.2  10.1  9.8  9.4  4.9  20.4  33.2  4.3  4.6  9.8  4.3  15.2  4.9  4.9  10.1  10.1  12.2  9.8  9.8  ASCE  Nemerow,  Management,

                                   (ft)  100  270  140  124  124  100  132  67  120  162  168  50  100  124  75  180  95  88  212  85  170  120  125  Design,  1959;  Waste
                                L
                                   (m)  30.5  82.3  42.7  37.8  37.8  30.5  40.2  20.4  36.6  49.4  51.2  15.2  30.5  37.8  22.9  54.9  29.0  26.8  64.6  25.9  51.8  36.6  38.1  Plant  York,  Hazardous


                             Data  Tanks  (#)  8  8  4  3  3  3  4  3  6  4  4  2  0.4  3  6  2  4  16  3  3  4  2  2  Treatment  New  Society,  and

                             Tank  Q  (mgd)  24.3  418  17  41  31  18.7  12.77  9.17  20.7  41  95  1.24  7.36  17  2.3  19.4  6.1  16.45  13.94  5.19  12.3  7.76  1.5  Sewage  the  Industrial

                             Settling  (m 3 =s)  1.06  18.31  0.74  1.80  1.36  0.82  0.56  0.40  0.91  1.80  4.16  0.05  0.32  0.74  0.10  0.85  0.27  0.72  0.61  0.23  0.54  0.34  0.07  ASCE-WPCF,  of Headquarters  of Strategies


                             Primary         Day)  Is.)                         Connecticut  Oklahoma  Connecticut  from  F.J.,




                          6.7  Rectangular  Location  Connecticut  Michigan  Wisconsin  (Bowery  (Talkmans  Indiana Wayne,  Wisconsin  Michigan  Indiana  Ward)  (26th  Point)  (Hunts  Pennsylvania  Virginia  Ohio  Michigan  Texas  Virginia  Michigan  City,  Florida  Virginia  Hartford,  Adapted  Federation,  Agardy,
                          TABLE    Plant  Hartford,  Detroit,  Racine,  NYC  NYC  Fort  Kenosha,  Jackson,  Hammond,  NYC  NYC  Abington,  Portsmouth,  Canton,  Niles,  Dallas,  Richmond,  Lansing,  Waterbury,  Oklahoma  Tampa,  Roanoke,  East  Sources:
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166