Page 203 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 203

Knowledge-Driven Modeling of Mineral Prospectivity                   205

























           Fig. 7-7. (A) An epithermal Au prospectivity map obtained via binary index overlay modeling,
           Aroroy district  (Philippines)  (see text for explanations  about  the input evidential maps used).
           Triangles are locations of known epithermal Au deposits; whilst polygon outlined in grey is area
           of stream sediment sample catchment basins (see Fig. 4-11). (B) Prediction-rate  curve of
           proportion of deposits demarcated by the predictions versus proportion of study area predicted as
           prospective. The dots along the prediction-rate curve represent classes of prospectivity values that
           correspond spatially with a number of cross-validation deposits (indicated in parentheses).


           maps, one must consider the significance of any modifications made in the modeling in
           terms of the geologic controls on mineral occurrence and/or spatial features that indicate
           the presence of mineral deposit occurrence.
              It is clear  from  the above  examples that binary index overlay modeling is more
           advantageous than Boolean logic modeling, especially in terms of producing a realistic
           multi-class output instead  of a synthetic  binary output.  We now turn to predictive
           modeling techniques,  whereby evidential maps can take on more than two classes of
           evidence  of  mineral prospectivity. These ‘multi-class’  modeling techniques provide
           more flexibility in assignment of evidential class scores than the ‘two-class’ techniques
           described so far.


           MODELING WITH MULTI-CLASS EVIDENTIAL MAPS
              In this type of modeling, evidential maps representing  prospectivity recognition
           criteria contain more than two classes (Figs. 7-1 and 7-8). Individual classes or ranges of
           values of evidence in an evidential map are hypothesised to have different degrees of
           importance  relative to the  proposition  under consideration and therefore are  given
           different scores depending on the concept of the spatial data modeling technique that is
           applied. Highest evidential scores are assigned to classes of spatial data portraying
           presence of indicative geological features and varying about the threshold spatial data
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208