Page 110 - Geothermal Energy Renewable Energy and The Environment
P. 110

96                           Geothermal Energy: Renewable Energy and the Environment



                      Table 6.2
                      hypothetical composition of a dilute Geothermal water at 100°c.
                      all concentrations are in millimolal
                      Temp. c    ph      na      k       ca      sio 2 (aq)  hco 3 −
                      100        6.7    0.43    0.026    2.49      2.50      0.44


                                3.0



                                 2.0       Calcite
                                                             Na–K feldspar
                                                               exchange
                                 1.0
                              Log (Q/K)   0.0






                               –1.0             α-cristobalite


                               –2.0
                                  0    50   100   150  200   250  300   350
                                                Temperature  (°C)
            FIGUre  6.5  Variation  of  log  (Q/K)  for  the  water  composition  in  Table  6.2  and  the  reactions  listed  in
            the text.

            will necessarily acquire a value of 1.0 at the temperature of equilibrium. Consequently, as shown in
            Figure 6.5, a plot of log Q/K versus temperature for each reaction will exhibit a common intersec-
            tion point of the curves at a value for log Q/K equal to zero at the temperature at which equilibrium
            was achieved.
              Theoretically, hydrolysis reactions similar to those given above can be written for every mineral
            phase in a geothermal reservoir. If those mineral phases are known, and the equilibrium constants
            for reactions involving the minerals are well established as a function of temperature, graphs like
            Figure 6.5 can be used with the water analysis for a geothermal site to establish the temperature of
            the reservoir. This technique can provide a crucial data point in a geothermal resource exploration
            program.
              However, a number of constraints limit the application of this approach. One constraint is the
            absence of high quality thermodynamic data for many of the mineral phases that are often present
            in geothermal reservoirs. Without that data, the equilibrium constants are not known and accurate
            Q/K values cannot be obtained. An assumption that also must be made is that there has been no
            chemical exchange between the rock and water after the water has left the reservoir. Since the water
            flow path after it exits the geothermal reservoir may be long and circuitous, this assumption may be
            problematic. Another constraint is lack of knowledge of the mineral phases that are actually pres-
            ent in a reservoir. This is especially true during exploration when little or no drilling information is
            available. Additionally, water analyses are often incomplete or of insufficient quality. Although SiO
                                                                                          2
            (aq), Na, K, and Ca are routinely done with high accuracy and precision, Al and Mg are often pres-
            ent at low abundances and are difficult to analyze with high accuracy and precision (Pang and Reed
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115