Page 285 - Geothermal Energy Systems Exploration, Development, and Utilization
P. 285

5.5 Groß Sch¨ onebeck  261
                         GrSk3/90 was tested to investigate scenarios of enhancing productivity of thermal
                         fluid recovery from the underground (Legarth et al., 2005; Reinicke et al., 2005;
                         Zimmermann et al., 2005). In order to complete the doublet system, a second well
                         Gt GrSk4/05 with a total depth of −4198 m had been drilled in 2006, followed
                         by three stimulation treatments to enhance productivity. In order to increase the
                         apparent thickness of the reservoir horizon, the new well is inclined in the reservoir
                                    ◦
                         section by 48 and was drilled in the direction of the minimum horizontal stress
                                 ◦
                         (S h = 288 azimuth) for optimum hydraulic fracture alignment in relation to the
                         stimulated preexisting well E GrSk3/90. Hence, the orientation of the fractures
                                 ◦
                         will be 18 azimuth in the direction of the maximum horizontal stress (Holl et al.,
                         2005). During the elapsed time of the geothermal project, it became obvious that
                         an appropriate numerical model becomes increasingly important for planning the
                         well path and fracture design, for interpretation of hydraulic tests and stimulations
                         as well as for prediction of reservoir behavior during the time of geothermal power
                         production.
                           To satisfy the requirements of the simulations, the model should implement
                         all the acquired knowledge of the reservoir. This includes the reservoir geology
                         and structure; the geometry of wells and fractures; the hydraulic, thermal, and
                         mechanical conditions of the reservoir; and generated fractures due to changes of
                         the reservoir conditions.

                         5.5.2
                         Model Description

                         5.5.2.1 Geology
                         The reservoir is located at a depth of −3850 to −4258 m within the Lower
                         Permian of the northeast German Basin. The reservoir rocks are classified into
                         two rock units from base to top: volcanic rocks (Lower Rotliegend of the Lower
                         Permian) and siliciclastics (Upper Rotliegend of the Lower Permian) ranging from
                         conglomerates to fine grained sand-, silt- and mudstones. These two main units can
                         be subclassified depending on their lithological properties, which are, in particular,
                         of importance for the hydraulic-thermal-mechanical (HTM) modeling:

                         • I: Hannover formation – silt- and mudstone
                           (−3850 to −3996 m true vertical depth subsea (TVDSS))
                         • IIA: Elbe alternating sequence: siltstone to fine grained sandstone
                           (−3996 to −4026 m TVDSS)
                         • IIB: Elbe base sandstone II: fine grained sandstone
                           (−4026 to −4086 m TVDSS)
                         • IIC: Elbe base sandstone I – fine to medium-grained sandstone
                           (−4086 to −4133 m TVDSS)
                         • III: Havel formation – conglomerates from fine sandstone to fine grained gravel
                           (−4133 to −4178 m TVDSS)
                         • IV: Volcanic rocks – ryolite and andesite
                           (−4178 to −4258 TVDSS)
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290