Page 39 - Innovations in Intelligent Machines
P. 39

Predicting Operator Capacity for Supervisory Control of Multiple UAVs  27
                              In terms of wait times, any additional time a vehicle spends in a degraded
                           state will add to the overall cost expressed in (5). Wait times that could incre-
                           ase mission cost can be attributed to 1) Missing a target which could either
                           mean physically not sending a UAV to the required target or sending it out-
                           side its established TOT window, and 2) Adding flight time through route
                           mismanagement, which in turn increases fuel and operational costs. Thus,
                           wait times will shift the cost curve upwards. However, because wait times will
                           likely be greater in a system with more events, and hence more UAVs, we
                           expect the curve to shift upwards to a greater extent as the number of UAVs
                           is increased.
                              In order to account for wait times in a cost-performance model, which
                           as previously demonstrated is critical in obtaining a more accurate operator
                           capacity prediction, we need a model of the human in our MUAV system,
                           which we detail in the next section.

                           3.5 The Human Model

                           Since the human operator’s job is essentially to “service” vehicles, one way to
                           model the human operator is through queuing theory. The simplest example
                           of a queuing network is the single-server network shown in Figure 9.
                              Modeling the human as a single server in a queuing network allows us
                           to model the queuing wait times, which can occur when events wait in the
                           queue for service either as a function of a backlog of events or the loss of
                           situation awareness. For our model, we model the inter-arrival times of the
                           events with an exponential distribution, and thus the arrivals of the events
                           will have a Poisson distribution. In terms of our model, the events that arrive
                           are vehicles that require intervention to bring them above some performance
                           threshold. Thus neglect time for a vehicle is the time between the arrival of
                           events from that particular vehicle and interaction time is the same as the
                           service time.
                              The arrival rate of events from each vehicle is on average one event per
                           each (NT + IT) segment. The total arrival rate of events to the server (the
                           operator) is the average arrival rate of events from each vehicle multiplied by
                           the number of vehicles.


                                                                     Service Rate
                                                                         µ
                                                         QUEUE
                                    Arrival rate
                                     of events                        SERVER
                                       l


                                                 Fig. 9. Single Server Queue
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44