Page 173 - Integrated Wireless Propagation Models

M a c r o c e l l P r e d i c t i o n M o d e l s - P a r t 2 : P o i n t - t o - P o i n t M o d e l s 151

1 0 0
1 0 0 � ;; �s; ;rt -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- � :: :: ;;� � 90
- smart
9 0 - 6_Sector Ql 80
Ol
"'
w 80 ---i --- Micro c 70
- 3 Sector Ql
� 7 Ql 60
.@ 0 _, __ 0mni t'
c.
� 60- <:
0 50
§ 50 t5
-tl 40
i � 30
"'
ffi () - smart
Sector
6
--
ti 20
20 - --- Micro
3_Sector
1 0 - 1 0 ....-. omni
0
0 ���--�------�------�------�
2 2.5 3.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Pathless exponent Pathless exponent
(a) Forward link, K = 3 (d) Forward link, K = 1 2
1 0 0
90 1 0 0
Ql 80 9 0 - smart
Ol - s _sector
� 70 Ql 80 --.-- Micro
Ol
Ql 3_Sector
t' � 7 0 ....-. omni
Ql 60
c. Ql t'
<: Ql 60
0 50 c.
t5 c 0 50
-tl 40
ffi 30 i 40
() 20 m 30
........- Micro ti 20
1 0 - 3_Sector 1 0
0 -.-- omni
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 2 2.5 3 3.5
Pathless exponent Pathless exponent
(b) Forward link, K = 4 (e) Reverse link without power control, K = 3
1 0 0 1 0 0
90 90
Ql 80 Ql 80
Ol
Ol "'
"'
c 70 c 70
Ql Ql
t'
Ql 60 t'
Ql 60
c. c.
<: <:
0 50 0 50
t5 t5
-tl 40 -tl 40
t� 30 - smart �
"' 30
() 20 - s _sector () 20 - s _Sector
--.-- Micro --- Micro
1 0 3_Sector 1 0 - 3_Sector
0 ....-. omni 0 -.-- omni
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Pathless exponent Pathless exponent
(c) Forward link, K = 7 (f) Reverse link without power control, K = 4
FIGURE 3.1.7.2.2.1 C/1 performance comparison among different systems.