Page 179 - Integrated Wireless Propagation Models
P. 179

M a c r o c e l l   P r e d i c t i o n   M o d e l s -  P a r t   2 :   P o i n t - t o - P o i n t   M o d e l s    157



                       u
          3.2   Fine-T n i n g the  Lee  Model 22
               Both terrain contour and human-made structures strongly affect the received mobile
               radio signal strength. But it is difficult to separate the effects of the natural environment
               and human-made structures on the received data for two reasons. First, in a natural
               environment, the ground is never flat; second, human-made structures in each area are
               different. Finding the propagation characteristics, such as the intercept signal level at a
               given range (1 km or 1 mile away from the base station) and the slope of path loss along
               the radio path, is a challenging task. This section introduces a method that can separate
               the effects of human-made structures from those of the terrain contour with a high
               degree of confidence. The propagation characteristics differ from different areas, and
               the proper ones are used as valuable inputs to the propagation prediction software
               program. The theoretical shadow loss and the effective antenna height gain are also
               compared with the large amounts of measured data when a mobile is either blocked or
               not blocked by terrain from the base station. Finally, a means of fine-tuning the propa­
               gation model due to the terrain effect by feeding back the measured data is discussed.
                  The increasing demand for cellular services offers a great challenge in designing
               cellular systems. To be able to design a good cellular system and fine-tune intricate
               parameters demands a good design tool. In the meantime, an accurate propagation
               prediction tool is a key to successfully designing a cellular system, especially in the early
               stages of cellular and PCS cell design. The alternative to the prediction tools is to drive
               every route in the interested areas before deciding on the locations of base stations, and
               this is both costly and tedious. A more practical and cost-effective solution would be to
               collect a sufficient amount of measurement data ahead of the system deployment and
               use the statistics gained from these values as an input to fit the prediction tool. It is
               necessary to collect the measured data so as to enhance the predicted outputs and at the
               same time reveal the characteristics of the region under consideration.
                  Since every area has its own unique building structures, terrain configuration, and
               morphology, it is very difficult to separate the effects caused by the natural obstructions
                                                                                    1
               of the area from the human-made obstructions of the measured radio signal data.5• 3 In
               general, the parameters can be classified in two categories:
                  Impact of Human-Made Structures.  The effect of human-made constructions can be
               translated to a path loss curve of slope and a 1-mile (or 1-km) intercept value, which become
               the input parameters for the prediction model. Thus, every region will have its own char­
               acteristic slope and intercept values due to the different human-made constructions.2
                  Impact of the Natural Terrain and Variation.  Variations in terrain, valleys, moun­
               tains, and so on. result in strong or weak signal reception, depending on the effective
               antenna height gain or loss in the nonobstructive case and on the diffraction loss in the
               obstructive case due to terrain contours. 1
                  The methodology of separating the effects of human-made structures from those of
               terrain contours using the pre-collected measurement data is discussed here. Then two
               deduced parameters are obtained as an input in the prediction tool. These two deduced
               parameters are the correct slope and the 1-mile intercept value for the area of interest.
                  In the real environment, the ground level is never flat, the structures above ground
               level are of different types, and the accuracy of the collected measurement data is never
               100 percent accurate. We cannot expect the measured data to be totally reliable, but the
               accuracy of the terrain database does play a major role in the prediction results.
                  We will first explain the method of how to separate the factors of human-made
               structures from the factors of natural terrain contours. Then examples will be presented
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184