Page 183 - Integrated Wireless Propagation Models
P. 183

I
                          M a c r o c e  I   P r e d i c t i o n  M o d e I s - P a r t  2 :  P o i n t - t o - P o i n t  M o d e I s   161









                                -  -  -  -  -  -



                                                         point
                                    - --  -
                                  .
                                 .
                              ___ ,_.. ... ....  ��flective
                                       plane
               FIGURE 3.2.3.1  LOS.

                                                                :
                                                               �
                   35.oo �----�----�----�----�----�----�----�----�-----.
                                                             •  • ••
                                                             •  ••
                                                   ,

                                                   .. ::.·
                   30.00 1----- -- +- -- -- -+- -- -- -+ -- -- ---1-- -- --.:�""�'..-=  • ••  • • • •   ,;
                   25.00 1-----  --  +-  --  --  -+-  --  --  -+  --  --  ---1--  --  . o"".:,'--+-- -- ----;c+---:- -- -+--  --  --+ --  --  ----1
                                                        ·
                                                       i
                w                                     -      �  �
                "'0                                   :
                                                     . .
                                                             ,,
                -�  20.00 r---  --  +-  --  --  -+-  --  --  -+  --  --  ----t----:-.�·,.._ -- +-- ----,.� .-t- ,  --  --  -+ --  --  --+ --  --  ----1
                                                        •
                ..r::.
                C»  1 5 .00 1----  --  +-  --  --  -+-  --  � ... ,\  --  -+  --  --  ---l'-'---- -- --'-+--......:.... --  ii, ------; �1-!: -+--  --  --+--  --  ----1
                �                                            0   _  ��
                Cii  1 0 .00 1----- -- +- -- -- -+- -- �-+ -- -- ---1-- -- -- +----'- ' ,_;,;•  +---.>'----+---  --  -+--  --  ---1
                (ij                                          . . 0  ,..   ":'-.-:,:
                                                              .'
                �  5 00        .  , , · .  \0            •''-'-'  ; .!'_ -  --  --  +---  --  +- --  --  --1
                                                              ' --+--
                                                         "�_....
                     •
                U5             :                        · ·,  · ·
                                             ,, . ... ... ,;:.� ·  .... .  i .  ,·�  : : r.:::� :
                        ;::;:   . . .. . . . .  ·�,  .. :�·ii.,  "
                    o.oo  , ... ,.; /.: z .. ;i; ::j �  ·'4l! , , , . • . : . - : ··:H !'t �"ii-;";i)-.-: -;. �#l'"-.-,,1> -- +-- -c,,.;- .----+- --  --  -+ --  --  --+ --  --  ----1
                                        ;>-
                                           ,
                                                    .
                           ·       ·   · -� r �·-�·•"r·  ·  ·  "'- • '  · ·  . ·   ·  . .
                              ... ·  ·    . .   ·        .
                                          ..
                   -5.00              :,; :·  �   I   !\'¥: ·   •.
                  -1 0.00  L_  __  __    L_  __  __   �  --  --  �  --  --  �  --  --  _L    __  __    _L  __  __   _L  __  __    �--  --  �
                      1 . 00                                                       1 0 .00
                                                 Distance (miles)
               FIGURE 3.2.3.2  LOS versus radial distance.
                  Figure 3.2.3.3 compares the theoretical effective antenna gain with the effective antenna
               gain derived from the drive test data after normalization. We can see that the actual effec­
               tive antenna gain can go higher than the theoretical value. The Lee model can be easily
               fine-tuned with the measurement data and enable those data to be flexible and accurate.
                  Figure 3.2.3.4 shows another situation when the terrain blocks the mobile. We will
               go through the same exercise for the terrain blocking situation in Sec. 3.2.4
               3.2.4  Comparison of Measured and Predicted Curves
                      for the Obstructive Paths
               In the previous section, we covered the effects of gains and losses due to terrain varia­
               tion where the mobile is in the nonobstructive path from the base station. Besides, the
               varying terrain contour along the path of the mobile traveling and the scattering loss
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188