Page 337 - Intelligent Digital Oil And Gas Fields
P. 337

Smart Wells and Techniques for Reservoir Monitoring          281


              For comparison with WAGCV, three processes that can help to increase res-
              ervoir recovery beyond primary depletion were selected: gas injection,
              water flooding, and traditional WAG.
                 In a separate exercise, the gas and water injection rates were optimized
              to determine the best rate of injection for gas and water, while the tradi-
              tional WAG was optimized by changing the slug ratio with time. The
              WAG exercise showed that the best combination is 6months of injecting
              water at 10,000 STB/D, followed by 6months of injecting gas at
              10 MMscf/D. In WAGCV, each region was set up with an ICV that
              controlled the injection rate. Oil rate and cumulative oil versus time
              are displayed in Fig. 7.20.
                 The oil rate profile for the gas injection scenario (purple line) shows a
              moderate plateau of 4500 STB/D for almost 2years, with a total cumulative
              oil of 12.5 million bbl in 15years. The oil rate profile for the water injection
              scenario (blue line) exhibits the longest plateau, but the decline rate is sharp
              compared with the other scenarios, so the cumulative oil by water injection
              is approximately the same as for gas injection: 12.2 million bbl. The tradi-
              tional WAG process follows the water injection profile, but production goes
              up and down (red dotted line) at a controlled decline rate for 10years, after
              which production drops sharply. The total cumulative oil is 16 million bbl,
              3.5 million bbl more than classic injection whereas WAGCV technique
              (green line) offers a better production profile, maintaining a slow decline rate
              for almost 10years. The total cumulative oil improves to 18.0 million bbl,

                 20,000    Gas injection  WAGCV                        5000
                Cumulative oil production, thousands of STB  10,000  Water injection  3000 Oil production rate, STB/D

                                                                       4000
                                      WAG traditional
                 15,000


                                                                       2000

                  5000


                                                                       0
                     0                                                 1000
                     01/01    09/03    06/06    03/09    12/11    09/14
              Fig. 7.20 WAGCV simulation: results of oil rate and cumulative oil profiles versus time
              (from Carvajal et al. 2015). Soft blue line is water injection only, red line is gas injection
              only, dotted purple line is traditional WAG injection, and green line is WAGCV injection.
              (Taken with permission from EAGE white paper 2214-4609.)
   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342