Page 161 - Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
P. 161

P1: IWV
                                                                                                12:28
                                                                                   May 20, 2005
                           CB908/Date
            0521853265c05
                     140
                            1.0         0 521 85326 5            2D CONVECTION – CARTESIAN GRIDS
                                     4
                                               5      F   80.00
                                  6
                                                      E   77.86
                                          JB4         D   75.71
                            0.8                    7
                                                      C   73.57
                                                IB2   B   71.43
                                    STEEL
                                          JB3         A   69.29
                            0.6
                                                      9   67.14
                                                      8   65.00  Figure 5.13. Isotherms – conduction in a re-
                                 IB1    CONCRETE
                                                      7   62.86  inforced cement concrete slab.
                            0.4
                                                      6   60.71
                                         JB2          5   58.57
                                                      4   56.43
                                     8
                                  JB1                 3   54.29
                            0.2          9
                                   A                  2   52.14
                                   B
                                 C                    1   50.00
                                           D
                                               E
                            0.0        F
                                        0.25       0.5
                               Figure 5.13 shows the computed temperature contours. Computations were car-
                            ried out by employing harmonic-mean conductivities at the cell faces. This is im-
                            portant because conductivities of concrete and steel are different (see interfaces
                            IB1, IB2, JB1, JB2, JB3, and JB4 marked on Figure 5.13). A 13(x 1 ) × 22(x 2 ) grid
                            is employed. The figure shows that, in the middle of the slab, the temperature is
                                                                                               ◦
                            almost uniform in both steel and concrete. The maximum temperature, 80 C, is
                            prescribed at the lower boundary and the predicted temperature at the top convec-
                            tive boundary is almost uniform at 54 C. The heat loss through the top boundary
                                                              ◦
                                                     2
                            is thus calculated at 60 W/m and this also equals the heat gain through the bottom
                            boundary since steady-state conditions prevail. Note that if the I-section beams
                            were not present, one would have 1D heat conduction through concrete alone and
                                                            2
                            the heat loss would then be 38.2 W/m . The presence of high-conductivity I-section
                            beams has enhanced the rate of heat transfer.


                            Periodic Laminar Flow and Heat Transfer
                            Compact heat exchangers often employ an offset-fin configuration to enhance con-
                            vectiveheattransferattheexpenseofanincreasedpressuredrop.However,whenge-
                            ometric parameters are suitably chosen, the overall thermo-hydraulic performance
                            (i.e., increased heat transfer for the same pumping power or reduced pumping power
                            for the same heat duty) is improved, resulting in a compact heat exchanger design.
                            Figure 5.14 shows an array of interrupted plates or blocks, which may be regarded
                            as a 2D idealisation of the offset-fin heat exchanger; the flow width in the x 3 direc-
                            tion is large. The length and the width of each block are L and t, respectively, and
                            the transverse pitch is H.
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166