Page 228 - Introduction to Mineral Exploration
P. 228

10: EVALUATION TECHNIQUES  211


                 where  C is the heterogeneity constant (Box  collect a minimum of 1000 particles. This
                 10.1) and K equals 125,000.                  will seem a trivial amount when collecting, for
                   From this a series of equal variance lines can  instance, a froth flotation product, but plants
                 be drawn with decreasing values of K, such as  have accurate sampling systems built into the
                 K/2, K/4, etc., which correspond to increasing  process system. It becomes important when
                 variances. For each stage, knowing M and the  dealing with larger particles, such as RC or
                                     2
                 increased value of  So (FE) the related coarser  blasthole rock chips, rocks in stockpiles, or
                 grain size (d) can be calculated from the Gy  on trucks. Invariably the amount required will
                 formula.                                     be larger than anticipated, but don’t forget if
                                                              the primary sample is unrepresentative, every-
                 Variation of the safety line                 thing else is a waste of time.
                 The heterogeneity constant (C) contains the
                 liberation factor β (Box 10.1). The safety lines  Hand or mechanical shovel splitting
                 above are calculated on the basis that this  Splitting samples is best completed by the pro-
                 factor is at its maximum value of 1.0 which  cess of alternative shovelling which minimizes
                 is a safe assumption but only correct when the  the splitting and preparation error contribution
                 top particle size is smaller than or equal to the  to the total error. The sample is spread either
                 liberation size (d lib ) of the valuable compon-  on a sheet of thick plastic or sheet iron which
                 ents. If  d is larger than  d lib  then  β becomes  is on a flat, clean, and smooth floor which
                       0.5
                 [d lib /d] , which is less than 1.0.         can easily be swept. The material is piled into
                   When the liberation size of the mineral of  a cone (step 1) which is then flattened into
                 interest is not known the value of 1.0 is used as  a circular cake (step 2) and the first step is
                 a safe procedure. This provides for the continu-  repeated three times for maximum mixing of
                 ously straight equal variance lines as described  the sample. Studies have shown that rolling on
                 above, with a slope of 3.0. When the liberation  a cloth or plastic sheet does not necessarily
                 size is known, the above formula can be used  cause mixing. If too slow the material just
                 with a β value of less than 1.0 but approaching  slides, and if too fast, there is a loss of the finer
                 this value as the grain size d is reduced. In this  particles thereby causing bias. From the final
                 case each sampling stage has a unique safety  cone, shovelfuls of material are taken con-
                 line slope from about 2.5 increasing to 3.0 as d  secutively around its circumference and placed
                 approaches d lib , with the less steep sections in  alternatively into two separate piles. In this
                 the coarser grain sizes. François-Bongarçon and  way the original cone, and sample, is split into
                 Gy (2002) point out that there are still common  two separate but equal smaller cones and the
                 errors being made when applying Gy’s formula.  choice as to which is the new sample is decided
                 They describe the main variable, the liberation  by the toss of a coin and not by the sampler.
                 size, and illustrate the importance of modeling  Further weight reduction is continued in
                 it with a worked example.                    exactly the same manner on the new sample.
                                                              Alternatively, the cone may be quartered with
                                                              a shovel and each quarter is further reduced in
                 Splitting of samples during reduction
                                                              the same way. This technique is referred to as
                 In each stage after reduction in grain size the  cone and quartering.
                 sample mass is correspondingly reduced by      The width of the hand, or small mechan-
                 splitting. The sampling described in this text is  ical, shovel should be at least three times the
                 concerned with small batches of less than 40 t  width of the diameter of the coarsest sample
                 and usually less than 1 t which are stationary  particle size which provides for a maximum
                 in the sense that they are not moving streams  possible size of about less than 100 mm with
                 of material on, say, a conveyor belt. In explora-  the former and less than 500 mm with the
                 tion, stationary samples include chip samples  latter tool. Shovels should always be over-
                 produced by percussion or reverse circulation  flowing and working with them partially filled
                 drilling (section 10.4).                     is not a good practice. Obviously, towards the
                   In the field it may be difficult to calculate  end of a splitting operation with finer grain
                 the weight of sample required. In such cases,  sizes a smaller sized tool has to be used.
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233