Page 210 - Sami Franssila Introduction to Microfabrication
P. 210

Moulding and Stamping 189


















                         (a)                         (b)                         (c)
           Figure 18.9 Imprint lithography: (a) embossing; (b) mould release (de-embossing) and (c) bottom clearing by RIE

           18.4 COMPARISON WITH LITHOGRAPHY            3. If 20 µm thick nickel pillars are needed as masters,
                                                         and master fabrication is by photolithography, what
           In optical lithography, the mask can be in contact with  is the smallest feature size that can be fabricated?
           the resist, but most often contact printing is avoided  4. What are the dimensional limitations of the HexSil
           and proximity printing is used instead. When optical  process?
           contact lithography was the mainstay of lithography,  5. How can you make hemispherical microlenses by
           mask makers had a big business in making replicates of  moulding/stamping methods?
           masks (work masks) from the master mask. The movie
           business uses a similar approach: the original film is
           never projected, just copies of it (or rather, slave masters  REFERENCES
           are made from the original, and theatre copies are made
           from the slave masters). Printing industries have been  Becker, H. & C. G¨ artner: Polymer microfabrication methods
                                                        for microfluidic analytical applications, Electrophoresis, 21
           using contact printing for centuries, so the basic problem  (2000), 12–26.
           is not the contact itself. The release process has to be  Bernard, B. et al: Printing meets lithography: soft approaches
           designed into the materials of the master and the film to  to high resolution patterning, IBM J. Res. Dev., 45 (2001),
           be imprinted.                                697.
             Replication masters need to be made with the final  Biebuyck, H.A. et al: Lithography beyond light: microcontact
           dimensions, just like 1X optical or X-ray lithography  printing with monolayer resists, IBM J. Res. Dev., 41 (1997),
           masks. Replication masters resemble X-ray lithography  159.
           masks in the sense that they are 3D objects, whereas  Bj¨ orkman, H. et al: Diamond replicas from microstructured
           optical masks are basically planar 2D objects. Therefore,  silicon masters, Sensors Actuators, 73 (1999), 24.
           the fabrication of 3D masters is more difficult than  Chou, S.Y. et al: Sub-10 nm imprint lithography and applica-
                                                        tions, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B15 (1997), 2897.
           photomask fabrication.
                                                       Horsley, D.A. et al: Design and fabrication of an angular
                                                        microactuator for magnetic disk drives, J. MEMS, 7 (1998),
                                                        141.
           18.5 EXERCISES
                                                       Waits, R.K.: Edison’s vacuum coating patents, J. Vac. Sci.
                                                        Technol., A19 (2001), 1666.
                                                  ◦
           1. If a PDMS stamp master with a CTE of 300 ppm/ C
                                                       Wang, D. et al: Nanometer scale patterning and pattern transfer
             is made by moulding over a 100 mm silicon wafer,
                                                        on amorphous Si, crystalline Si and SiO 2 surfaces using self-
             what is the positional accuracy that can be achieved?  assembled monolayers, Appl. Phys. Lett., 70 (1997), 1593.
           2. Design fabrication processes and layouts for the  Wang, S.N. et al: Novel processing of high aspect ratio
             silicon moulds that have been used to make the  structures of high density PZT, Proc. IEEE MEMS (1998),
             diamond microstructures shown in Figure 18.3.  p. 223.
   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215