Page 63 - Sami Franssila Introduction to Microfabrication
P. 63

42 Introduction to Microfabrication









                            (111) p-type  (111) n-type  (100) p-type  (100) n-type  (100) n-type
            Figure 4.8 Wafer flats and notches for identifying wafer orientation and doping type

            Wafer breakage often starts from a crack at the wafer  are specified for particle cleanliness. Laser light scatter-
            edge, and because silicon is brittle, the crack propagates  ing can be used to measure particle size distributions
            through the whole wafer. The wafers are marked by  down to 60 nm sizes, but even unaided eye can detect
            laser scribing. This is done early on so that subsequent  particles larger than ca. 0.3 µm because of their scatter-
            steps remove the silicon dust generated by marking.  ing under intense light (e.g., from a slide projector).
            Alphanumeric or bar-code marking enable wafer identity  Wafers are specified for a number of electrical,
            tracking during the processing.              mechanical, contamination and other properties as
              Etching is then used to remove the lapping damage:  agreed between the wafer manufacturer and chip
            both alkaline (KOH) and acidic (HF-HNO 3 ) etches  maker. The specifications in Table 4.4 shows examples
            can be used. Roughness is reduced somewhat in acid  of wafer specifications, both for integrated circuits
            etching, but not in alkaline etching. An annealing step at  and microelectrical systems. Wafer resistivities and
                     ◦
            600 to 800 C destroys thermal donors that are charged  dopant concentrations, and the corresponding short-hand
            interstitial oxygen complexes.               notations are shown in Table 4.5. More discussion on
              Final polishing with 10 nm silica slurry in alka-  wafer specs will be found in Chapters 24 and 25.
            line solution removes ca. 20 µm of silicon and results
            in 0.1 to 0.2 nm RMS surface roughness. Silicon is  Table 4.4  Specifications for 100 mm wafers, some typical
            lost in the above-mentioned steps so that ca. half  values
            of the original ingot ends up as wafer material. In
            many power-device and solar-cell applications polish-      IC              MEMS
            ing is not needed because the structures are wide
                                                         Growth method  CZ             CZ
            and films are rather thick, therefore, the etched wafer
                                                         Type/dopant   P/boron         P/boron
            surface quality is enough. This is a significant cost-
                                                         Orientation   100             100
            saving because polishing is an expensive step. On                ◦                ◦
                                                         Off-orientation  0.0 ± 1.0    0.0 ± 0.2
            the other hand, in many micro-electro-mechanical sys-
                                                         Resistivity   16–24 ohm-cm    1–10 ohm-cm
            tem (MEMS) applications, double-side polishing is  Diameter  100.0 ± 0.5 mm  100.0 ± 0.5 mm
            essential both for double-side lithography and for  Thickness  525 ± 25 µm  380 ± 10 µm
            wafer bonding.                               Front side    Polished        Polished
              Inspection and cleaning steps constitute a major  Backside  Etched       Polished
            fraction of all wafering steps. The wafers are mea-  Primary flat  <110> ± 1 deg,  ±0.2 ◦
            sured for mechanical and electric properties. Contact-       32.5 ± 2.5 mm
            less measurements, for example, capacitance, optical  Oxygen level  13–16 ppma  11–15 ppma
            and eddy-current methods, are preferred because contact  Particles  <20 @ 0.3 µm  <20 @ 0.3 µm
            methods introduce contamination and damage. Wafers

                                     Table 4.5  Resistivity versus dopant concentration

                         Dopant level      Designation    Dopant         Resistivity n/p
                                                        concentration      (ohm-cm)
                                                             −3
                                                          (cm )
                         Very lightly doped  n −− , p −−  <10 14      >100/>30
                                                          14
                                            −
                         Lightly doped     n , p −      10 –10 16     1–100/0.3–30
                                                          16
                         Moderately doped  n, p         10 –10 18     0.03–1/0.02–0.3
                                            +
                                                          18
                         highly doped      n , p +      10 –10 19     0.01–0.03/0.005–0.02
                         Very highly doped  n ++ , p ++  10 19        0.001 < 0.01/0.005
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68