Page 327 - Lindens Handbook of Batteries
P. 327

BUTTOn CELL BATTErIES: SILVEr OxIDE–ZInC AnD ZInC-AIr SYSTEmS        13.33

                                                 1.0



                                                 0.8     80% RH

                                                                          30% KOH
                                               P electrolyte /P water  0.6  59% RH  50% RH
                                                                             33% KOH

                                                                   52% RH

                                                 0.4



                                                 0.2                         20% RH


                                                    0      10     20      30      40     50
                                                                    % KOH
                                              FiGURE 13.32  Closed container relative humidity as a function of KOH
                                              concentration.



                                      taBle 13.8  Average cell weight change after 7 days at 20°C on open stand in various rel-
                                      ative humidity conditions for three commercially available size Pr41 (312) zinc/air batteries
                                                                       Cell Weight Change (mg)
                                              Cell limiting current
                                       Design      (mA)      20% rH     50% rH   80% rH   Total range
                                         A          7.5       –7.3       0         5.8      13.1
                                         B         10.4      –10.4      –1.9       6.7      17.1
                                         C         13.9      –11.7      –1.4       9.7      23.6



                                   With  the  lowest  average  limiting  current,  design A  had  the  lowest  total  range  of  cell  weight
                                change after 7 days. Design C’s average limiting current was 85% higher and had 80% more total
                                weight change than design A. Figure 13.33 compares the average 7-day cell weight changes of the
                                three designs in three different humidity environments. The graph illustrates how the designs are tar-
                                geted for relative humidity environment. Design A crosses the no-weight-change line at 50% relative
                                humidity, while design B crosses the no-weight-change line at between 55 and 60% relative humidity.
                                If design A and design B had the same limiting current, design A would have less weight change in
                                the low-humidity environment but more weight change in the high-humidity environment.
                                   Initially, the three designs were submitted to two test loads at various relative humidities. The first
                                evaluation was on the lower drain 1500 ohm, 12 h/day test. The typical duration for this test at 50%
                                relative humidity is about 16 to 18 days. Figure 13.33 compares the performance of the three designs
                                on this test in a 20 and 50% relative humidity environment. To normalize the different capacities,
                                the results of each capacity test are plotted in Fig. 13.34 as a percentage of each design’s average
                                1500 ohm, 12 h/day result compared to the 50% rH test result.
                                   The second evaluation was at the moderate drain 620 ohm, 16 h/day test. The typical duration for
                                this test at 50% relative humidity is about 5 to 6 days. Figure 13.35 compares the performance of
   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332