Page 263 - Marks Calculation for Machine Design
P. 263

P1: Shibu
                          January 4, 2005
                                      14:56
        Brown.cls
                 Brown˙C06
                                     STATIC DESIGN AND COLUMN BUCKLING
                      Example 3 (Sec. 5.3):
                                           1/2                                    245
                              2    2                   2     2          1/2

                             σ + σ − σ 1 σ 2   1  ((112) + (56) − (112)(56))
                              1   2
                                            =   =
                                   S y         n             84
                            1   (12,544 + 3,136 − 6,272) 1/2  (9,408) 1/2  96.99
                              =                       =         =      = 1.15
                            n             84               84      84
                                  1
                             n =    = 0.87 (unsafe)
                                1.15
                      Example 4 (Sec. 5.3):
                                           1/2
                              2   2                   2      2           1/2

                             σ + σ − σ 1 σ 2  1   ((70) + (−70) − (70)(−70))
                              1   2
                                            =   =
                                   S y        n              84
                            1   (4,900 + 4,900 + 4,900) 1/2  (14,700) 1 / 2  121.24
                              =                      =          =      = 1.44
                            n            84               84       84
                                 1
                            n =     = 0.69 (unsafe)
                                1.44
                    Step 4. Compare the factors-of-safety found in step 3 with the maximum-normal-stress
                    theory for Example 3 and the maximum-shear-stress theory for Examples 5 and 4.
                      As stated earlier, the combination for Example 2 falls directly on the boundary and where
                    all three theories coincide. As both of the principal stresses in Example 3 are positive, use
                    the first expression in Eq. (6.2) to give
                      Example 3 (Sec. 5.3):
                                          σ 1  1   112
                                             =   =    = 1.33
                                          S y  n   84
                                                1
                                           n =     = 0.75 (unsafe)
                                               1.33
                    where the factor-of-safety is smaller than obtained with the distortion-energy theory.
                      For Examples 5 and 4, use the expression in Eq. (6.6) to give
                      Example 5 (Sec. 5.2):
                                    σ 1 − σ 2  1  83 − (−33)  116
                                           =   =          =    = 1.38
                                      S y    n      84      84
                                              1
                                         n =     = 0.72 (unsafe)
                                             1.38
                      Example 4 (Sec. 5.3):
                                    σ 1 − σ 2  1  70 − (−70)  140
                                           =   =          =    = 1.67
                                      S y    n      84      84
                                              1
                                         n =     = 0.60 (unsafe)
                                             1.67
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268