Page 354 - Mechanics of Asphalt Microstructure and Micromechanics
P. 354

T
   346   Ch a p t e r e n

                       120000
                     Computation Time (Sec.)  80000
                       100000



                        60000
                        40000
                        20000
                            0
                           0.0E+00    4.0E+04   8.0E+04    1.2E+05    1.6E+05
                                             Element Number
              FIGURE 10.21  Computation time versus number of elements.


              compare the different digitized ratios on the influence of overall deformation. An ap-
              propriate ratio was selected to reduce the element number without loss of computa-
              tional accuracy significantly. The deformations obtained from the images with different
              resolutions are compared in Figure 10.22. After the comparison, the image with the
              resolution of 0.97 mm/pixel (30% of original image size) was selected.
                 Through the above process, the number of elements was drastically reduced. How-
              ever, to simulate the APA test with many loading cycles, the computation time is still
              very expensive. To solve the difficulty, an analysis was conducted to study the affecting
              area under the loading application. From St. Venant’s principle, a load applied to the
              material will only have local effects around the location where it is applied, and for the
              area that is far away, the responses of the material are not significantly affected. Based
              on this principle, simulations with certain loading cycles were conducted to determine
              the affecting area. Figures 10.23 and 10.24 show the affecting areas after the application
              of load in vertical and horizontal directions, respectively.
                 The affecting area was determined based on comparison of the deformations with
              different coring areas. At first, the deformations for the coring area with different widths
              and original height of the specimen were compared in Figure 10.25 to determine the


                         3.00E-04

                        Deformation (mm)  2.00E-04




                         1.00E-04


                         0.00E+00
                                 0         10         20         30        40
                                             Redigitized Ratio (Percent)
              FIGURE 10.22  Deformations versus digitized ratio.
   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359