Page 216 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 216

Bimolecular Electrophilic Substitution at Saturated Carbon  205
                 R
      Figure 4.8 Transition state for  backside SE2 displacement.
      Figure 4.9  Transition state for frontside SE2 displacement.
          We shall only discuss  experiments that  shed  light on  the first  three  types
      (Reactions 4.43-4.45),  but the characteristics of all five types of mercury exchange
      reactions seem to be very similar.
          The first question we shall ask is whether bimolecular mercury exchanges
     proceed  with  retention  or inversion  of configuration at the central  carbon. We
      shall  then see if we can decide whether  the transition state is open  (S,2  mecha-
      nism) or cyclic (S,i  mechanism). If the reactions proceed with inversion  of con-
      figuration,  then  the  mechanism  must  be  S,2.  The geometry  of  the  activated
      complex leading to inversion would be very similar to that leading to S,2  substi-
      tution.  The electrophile,  attacking the carbon from the back  side, would  cause
      carbon  to  rehybridize from sp3 to sp2 so  that  the  remaining P orbital could  be
      shared  by  it  and  the  leaving group  (Figure 4.8). The difference  between  this
      transition state and the transition state for backside displacement in the S,2 reac-
      tion is, of course, that in the SE2 reaction the three participating atomic orbitals
      share a  total of two electrons whereas in the S,2  reaction  they share a  total of
      four. Retention ofconfiguration could result from either an SE2 or an S,i  mechan-
      ism. In either case the electrophile would attack the sp3 orbital used  in bonding
      with the leaving group from the front side (Figure 4.9).
          The first detailed study of the stereochemistry of a mercury exchange reac-
      tion  that was known  to be bimolecular was carried  out as
                                                                    Di-s-butyl-
      mercury was prepared  by reacting optically active s-butylmercuric bromide with
      racemic s-butylmagnesium bromide as shown in Equation 4.48.
      O3  (a) H. B.  Charman, E. D. Hughes, and C. K. Ingold, J. Chem. Soc., 2530 (1959):  (b) F. R. Jensen,
      J. Amrr.  Chem.  Soc.,  82, 2469  (1960);  (c) 0. A.  Reutov  and  E.  V.  Uglova,  BII/[. Acad.  Sri.  USSR,
      Chem. Div. Sci., 1628 (1959).
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221