Page 288 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 288

1,2-Shifts in Carbenium Ions  275

      give the same products, 11 and 12, in the same ratio (9 : 1) when they undergo the
      pinacol rearrangement with BF,-ether  complex, as shown in Scheme 1 .I7 (Note
      that the hydroxy  group lost here, as usual,  is  the one that gives the most stable
      carbocation.ls)  If the migrating group provided  anchimeric assistance, it would
      have to come in from the back side of the departing -+OH2.  In Compound 9 the
      group that can come in from the back side is the hydride, and Compound 11 should
      be the principal product.  Conversely, in Compound 10 it is the alkyl chain of the
     ring  that  can  come  in  from  the  back  side,  and  the  chief  product  should  be
      Compound 12. The fact that the products are formed in a constant ratio indicates
      that  a  common  intermediate-presumably   the  planar  carbocation-must   be
      formed from both starting materials.lS More direct stereochemical evidence has
      been provided by Kirmse and co-workers. Chiral (S)-2-methylbutan-l,2-diol (13)
      rearranges to racemic 2-methylbutanal  (14) as shown in Equation 6.13.20










      (See also pp. 281-284.)
     Aryl Participation-The  Phenonium Ion Controversy21
     A question  that has  aroused  considerable  controversy  in  the  past  25  years  is
     whether  aryl  groups  can provide  anchimeric  assistance and  if so  under  what
     conditions. The controversy  began  in  1949 when  Cram solvolyzed the L-threo
     and L-erythro isomers of 3-phenyl-2-butyl tosylate in acetic acid. L-Threo-tosylate
      gave 96 percent racemic threo-acetate (plus olefins), whereas the L-erythro isomer
     gave  98  percent  L-erythro-acetate.22 To  explain  the  experimental  facts,  Cram
     postulated  that neighboring phenyl  begins a  backside  migration  to  C,  as  the
      tosylate departs. At the first energy maximum both the tosylate and the phenyl


       P.  L. Barili, G. Berti, B.  Macchia,  F.  Macchia,  and L.  Monti, J. Chem. Soc. C, 1168 (1970).
        (a) See note  l(b), p.  268, for examples and  exceptions;  for  another  exception  see  (b) W.  M.
      Schubert and P.  H. LeFevre, J. Amer. Chcm. SOC., 94,  1639 (1972).
      lo Departure of the leaving group is apparently rate-determining when the first-formed carbocation
      is  not  particularly  stabilized.  This  is  shown  by  the fact  that  the  rate  of  rearrangement  of  alkyl
      glycols is dependent on the concentration of
                                      R   R
                                      I   I
                                   R--C-R
                                      I   I
                                     +OH2 OH
      U. F. Duncan and K. R. Lynn, J. Chm. Soc., 3512, 3519 (1956); J. B.  Ley and C. A.  Vernon, Chcm.
      Ind.  (London),  146 (1956).]  That the rate-determining step can be  the migration  when  the  first-
      formed  carbocation  is  particularly  stable  has been shown by  Schubert and LeFevre [note  18(b)].
      These workers subjected  1,l-diphenyl-2-methyl-1,2-propanediol to the pinacol rearranggment  and
      found that deuterium substitution in the migrating methyls caused the reaction to slow down.
      20 W.  Kirmse, H. Arold, and B.  Kornrumpf, Chem. Ber.,  104,  1783 (1971).
      21  C. J. Lancelot,  D. J. Cram,  and P.  v.  R. Schleyer, in Carbonium Zonr,  G.  A.  Olah and P.  v.  R.
      Schleyer, Eds.,  Wiley-Interscience, New York,  1972, Vol.  111.
      22  D. J. Cram, J. Amer. Chcm. Soc.,  71, 3863 (1949).
   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293