Page 415 - Microsensors, MEMS and Smart Devices - Gardner Varadhan and Awadelkarim
P. 415

REFERENCES     395

     The  output voltage  can  be  calculated  for  a  given  Coriolis  force,  which  is  determined
  by  the  rotation  rate  (see  Figure  13.33).  The  gyroscopes  were  fabricated  by  both  the  lift-
  off 4  and  reactive  ion-etching  (RIE)  techniques  using  the  Pennsylvania  State University
  Nanofabrication  facility.  The  lift-off  technique  was  adequate  for  75 MHz  gyroscopes,
  which have a minimum feature size  of  about  6 um.
     The  response  of  the  SAW  gyroscope  was  evaluated  using  a  rate  table.  The  output
  response  was measured using an HP dynamic signal  analyzer fed by an RF lock-in ampli-
  fier.  The  gyroscope  is fixed to a rate  table,  which, when excited  at a constant frequency,
  causes  the rate  table  to oscillate, and the gyroscope is measured  for each  setting. Both the
  frequency  and  the  amplitude  of  the  driving  signal  controls  the  amplitude of  oscillations
  of  the  table,  which in  turn  varies  the  rotation  rate.  Figure  13.33  presents  the  measured
  and  computed  output voltages  from  the  SAW gyroscope  for  different  rotation rate.



  13.5  CONCLUDING        REMARKS

  In this chapter, we have described  some of the many sensing applications  to which a SAW-
  IDT microsensor  may be applied.  The principles  that govern  these  IDT sensors  have been
  presented  along with the input-output equations. The versatility  of this technology is very
  impressive  and  permits  a  wide  variety  of  different  sensing  applications,  such  as  strain,
  pressure,  temperature,  conductivity, and dielectric  constant.
     The  next  chapter  is  dedicated  to  the  topic  of  IDT-MEMS  sensors  that  represent  an
  exciting  development  combining  the  fields  of  MEMS  and  SAW-IDT  devices.  The  final
  example  of a SAW-IDT  device is described in Section  15.2  and is associated with a type
  of  smart  sensor  called  an  electronic tongue.  It  complements  the  description  of  another
  smart  sensor  also  given  in the final chapter  called  the electronic nose.


  REFERENCES

  Achenbach, J.  D. (1973).  Wave  Propagation in Elastic Solids,  Elsevier  North-Holland,  Amsterdam,
    pp.  187–194.
  Ballantine,  D.  S. et al. (1997). Acoustic  Wave Sensors: Theory, Design and Physico-Chemical Appli-
     cations,  Academic  Press,  New York.
  Bao,  X.  Q.,  Varadan, V.  V.  and  Varadan,  V.  K.  (1987).  "SAW temperature  sensor  and  remote
    reading  system,"  IEEE  Ultrasonics Symp.,  2, 583–585.
  Bao,  X.  Q.,  Varadan, V.  V.  and  Varadan, V.  K.  (1994).  "Wireless  surface  acoustic  wave  tempera-
     ture  sensor," J.  Wave  Material  Interact.,  9,  19-27.
  Bell,  D. T.  and Li, R. C.  (1976).  "Surface  acoustic  wave resonators,"  Proc. IEEE,  64,  711–721.
  Campbell,  C.  K. (1998). Surface  Acoustic  Wave Devices for  Mobile and  Wireless  Communications,
    Academic  Press,  New York.
  Campbell,  J. J.  and Jones,  W.  R.  (1968).  "A  method  for estimating  optimal  crystal cuts and  propa-
    gation directions for excitation of piezoelectric  surface waves,"  IEEE  Trans. Sonics  Ultrasonics,
     15, 209-217.
  Cross,  P.  S. and Schmidt, R.  V. (1977).  "Coupled  surface acoustic wave resonator,"  Bell Syst.  Tech.
    J.,  56, 1447–1481.
  Datta,  S.  (1986).  Surface  Acoustic  Wave  Devices, Ch.  3, Prentice-Hall,  New  Jersey.

  4
    The  lift-off  process  was described  in Chapter  12.
   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420