Page 239 - Modern Control Systems
P. 239

Section  3.11  Summary                                              213


                        %  Model  Parameters
                        k=10;                        Units
                        M 1=0.02; M2=0.0005;         k: kg/m
                                                     b: kg/m/s
                        D1—41 Ue-UJ, D^—4.1 e-Uo,  *
                        t=[0:0.001:1.5];             m:kg
                        % state apace Moael
                        A=[0 0 1 0;0 0 0  1;-k/M1 k/M1  -b1/M1 0; k/M2 -k/M2 0 -b2/M2];
                        B=[0;0;1/M1;0]; C=[0 0 0 1]; D=[0j; sys=ss(A,B,C,D);
                        % Simulated Step Response
                        y=step(sys,t); plot(t,y); grid
                        xlabel(Time  (s)'), ylabel('y dot (m/s)')


                            3
                                         I
                          2.5
                                 AAA
                            2
                                         1
                        r  i.5         Mass 2
                        o
                                     position rate
                            1
      FIGURE  3.42        0.5    --      |  -
      Response of y for a
      step input for the    0                         i
      two-mass  model                   0.5          1           1.5
      with/c  =  10.                         Time (s)



      3.11  SUMMARY

                       In  this chapter, we have  considered  the  description  and  analysis  of  systems in  the
                       time  domain. The  concept  of  the  state  of  a  system  and  the  definition  of  the  state
                       variables of a system were discussed. The selection  of a set of state variables of a sys-
                       tem  was  examined,  and  the  nonuniqueness  of  the  state  variables  was noted. The
                       state differential  equation  and the solution for x(t)  were discussed. Alternative sig-
                       nal-flow  graph and  block diagram model structures were considered  for  represent-
                       ing  the  transfer  function  (or  differential  equation)  of  a  system.  Using  Mason's
                       signal-flow  gain formula, we noted the ease  of obtaining the flow graph model. The
                       state  differential  equation  representing  the  flow graph  and  block  diagram  models
                       was also examined. The time response of a linear system and its associated  transition
                       matrix was discussed, and the utility of Mason's signal-flow  gain formula  for obtain-
                      ing the transition matrix was illustrated. A detailed analysis of a space station model
                       development was presented for a realistic scenario where the attitude control is ac-
                       complished  in  conjunction  with  minimizing  the  actuator  control. The  relationship
                       between  modeling  with  state  variable  forms  and  control  system  design  was estab-
                      lished. The use of control design software  to convert a transfer function  to state vari-
                       able form  and calculate the state transition matrix was discussed and illustrated. The
                       chapter  concluded  with the development  of a state variable model for  the Sequen-
                       tial Design Example: Disk Drive Read  System.
   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244