Page 332 - MODERN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
P. 332

268 CHAPTER 3

             2. J. C. Rasaiah, “Theories of Electrolyte Solutions,” in The Liquid State and Its Electrical
               Properties, E. E. Kunhardt, L. G. Christophorou, and L. H. Luessen, eds., NATO ASI Series
               B 193: 135 (1987).

            Papers
             1. C. F. Baes, Jr., E. J. Reardon, and B. A. Bloyer, J. Phys. Chem. 97:12343 (1993).
             2. H. P. Diogo, M. E. Minas da Piedade, and J. J. Moura Ramos, J. Chem. Ed. 70: A227
               (1993).
             3. H. Schönert, J. Phys. Chem. 98: 643 (1994).
            4. H. Schönert, J. Phys. Chem. 98: 654 (1994).
            5. B. Honig and A. Micholls, Science 268: 1144 (1995).
             6. B. B. Laird and A. D. J. Haymet, J. Chem. Phys. 100: 3775 (1996).


           3.5. THE TRIUMPHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE DEBYE–HÜCKEL
                THEORY OF ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS


           3.5.1. How Well Does the Debye–Hückel Theoretical Expression for
                  Activity Coefficients Predict Experimental Values?

               The approximate theoretical equation




           indicates that the logarithm of the activity coefficient must decrease linearly with the
                                                                     16
           square root of the ionic strength or, in the case of 1:1-valent electrolytes,  with
           Further, the  slope of  the  log   versus  straight line can  be unambiguously
           evaluated from fundamental physical constants and from  Finally,  the  slope does
           not depend on the particular electrolyte (i.e., whether it is NaCl or KBr, etc.) but only
           on its valence type, i.e., on the charges borne by the ions of the electrolyte, whether it
           is a 1:1-valent or 2:2-valent electrolyte, etc. These are clear-cut predictions.
               Even before any detailed comparison with experiment, one can use an elementary
           spot check: At infinite dilution, where the interionic forces are negligible, does the
           theory yield the activity coefficient that one would expect from experiment, i.e., unity?
           At infinitedilution, c or  which means that log  or     The properties
           of an  extremely  dilute solution of ions should be the same as  those of a solution
           containing nonelectrolyte particles. Thus, the Debye–Hückel theory emerges success–
           fully from the infinite dilution test.
               Furthermore, if one takes the experimental values of the activity coefficient (Table
           3.6) at extremely low electrolyte concentration and plots log   versus   curves, it



           16
            That is,     For a 1:1 electrolyte,   As
   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337