Page 122 - Neural Network Modeling and Identification of Dynamical Systems
P. 122

3.4 ANN-BASED CONTROL OF DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS               111

































                          FIGURE 3.8 Comparison of the operation of the network (28 neurons, sigmoid activation function, full training set) and
                          mathematical model (3.23). The solid line is model output (3.23); the dotted line is the output of the neural network model;
                          the target mean square error is 1×10 −8 ; V z is the component of the velocity vector along the Oy-axis; q is the angular velocity
                          of the pitch; t is the time; the value of the deflection angle of the stabilizer δ e is taken equal to −8 grad (From [99], used with
                          permission from Moscow Aviation Institute).

                          is as close as possible to the behavior of the ref-  the biases b of the neural network motion model
                          erence model.                                which is the part of the combined network (the
                            To create a reference model, minor changes  ANN plant model + neurocontroller).
                          were made to the initial model of the Su-17    It was allowed to vary only parameters for
                          airplane motion by introducing an additional  the network part that corresponded to the neu-
                          damping coefficient into it, which was selected
                                                                       rocontroller. Connections of neurons in the net-
                          in such a way that the nature of the transient
                                                                       work were organized in such a way that the out-
                          processes had a pronounced aperiodic appear-  put of the neurocontroller  δ e, k was fed to the
                          ance.                                        input of the neural network model δ e as addi-
                            The results of testing the reference model
                          (3.25) in comparison with the original model  tions to the initial (command) position of the all-
                                                                       turning horizontal stabilizer, and input signals
                          (3.23)are showninFig. 3.13.
                                                                       came simultaneously to the input of the neuro-
                            The generation of a training set for the task
                          of synthesis of the neurocontroller occurred on  controller and to the input of the neural network
                          the same principle as for the task of identifying  model.
                          a mathematical model.                          Fig. 3.14 shows the result of testing the neu-
                            When training the neurocontroller network,  rocontroller combined with the neural network
                          it was forbidden to change the weights W and  model.
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127