Page 186 - Neural Network Modeling and Identification of Dynamical Systems
P. 186

5.3 SEMIEMPIRICAL ANN-BASED MODEL DERIVATIVES COMPUTATION      177
                          TABLE 5.1 Model prediction error for each stage of model design.
                                                Theory         ANN-1          ANN-2          ANN-3          Empir
                          Euler                 0.13947        0.13593        0.12604        0.01394        –
                          Adams–Bashforth       0.07143        0.07104        0.03883        0.01219        –
                          NARX                  –              –              –              –              0.02821



                                                                       “Empir” signifies the best results for the empiri-
                                                                       cal NARX model of the system.



                                                                        5.3 SEMIEMPIRICAL ANN-BASED
                                                                                 MODEL DERIVATIVES
                                                                                     COMPUTATION

                                                                         Semiempirical neural network–based models
                                                                       of the form (5.2) are continuous time models, in
                                                                       contrast to discrete time purely empirical mod-
                                                                       els, described in Chapter 2; hence the training
                                                                       methods for these models are also formulated
                                                                       in continuous time. Despite the fact that the
                                                                       actual implementation of these algorithms re-
                                                                       quires the appropriate finite difference approx-
                                                                       imations of the ODEs, the continuous time algo-
                                                                       rithm versions provide an additional flexibility
                                                                       in the choice of the most suitable finite difference
                                                                       method. The total error function E : R n w  → R
                                                                                                      ¯
                                                                       evaluated on the training set of the form (5.1)is
                          FIGURE 5.9 Canonical form of the semiempirical model  asumof errors E (p)  : R n w  → R for its individual
                          (Adams–Bashforth method) with additional dependence on  trajectories:
                          x 2 .
                                                                                           P
                                                                                               (p)
                                                                                    ¯
                                                                                   E(w) =    E   (w).        (5.7)
                          curacy of the semiempirical model is even better                p=1
                          – the prediction error equals 0.01219, hence we                    (p)
                                                                       The individual errors E  have the following
                          might expect even better results for the more so-
                                                                       form:
                          phisticated numerical methods.
                            Computational experimental results for each            ¯ t  (p)

                          modeling stage are presented in Table 5.1.The  E (p) (w) =  e(˜y (p) (t), ˆ x (p) (t,w),w)dt,  (5.8)
                          following abbreviations are used in this table:
                                                                                   0
                          “Theory” signifies results for the initial theo-
                          retical model (5.4); ANN-1, ANN-2, ANN-3 de-  where ¯ t (p)  = t K (p) are the time segment dura-
                          note results for the semiempirical model after  tions, ˜y (p) (t) are the target values of observ-
                          the first, second, and third modification stages;  able outputs, ˆ x (p) (t,w) are the model states,
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191