Page 281 - Origin and Prediction of Abnormal Formation Pressures
P. 281

PORE WATER COMPACTION CHEMISTRY AS RELATED TO OVERPRESSURES           253

            TABLE  10-5
            Mineralization  and  content  of  various  ions  in  solutions  squeezed  out  at  different  pressures  from  smectite
            clay  (API  No.  25,  Upon,  WY,  USA)  saturated  with  seawater  (after  Rieke  et  al.,  1964,  table  3,  p.  31)
            Overburden  pressure   Percentage  of the  concentration  in  solution  squeezed-out  at  100 psi
            (psi)            C1-      Na +      Ca 2+   Mg 2+   SO 2-   Total  mineralization
              100            100      100       100     100    100     100
              400             91-95   93-95     75-84    -      84-95    -
             1,000            70-83   84 a      67 a     80 a    _       _
             3,000            40-82   25(?)-87   50-62   60 a   67-81    -
            10,000            36-61    .     .     .     .    .
            40,000            36 a    37 a      25 a     -      38 a     _
            90,000             .     .    .     .     .                 20 a
            a Only  one  trial.



               The concentrations of the dissolved constituents in the pore water were determined by
            squeezing  Maykop  Clay  samples  at room  temperature  and  at  80~   Kazintsev's  results
            (Fig.  10-14B)  show  that  the  concentration  of  C1-  and  Na +  decrease  with  increasing
            pressure.  The  temperature  does  not  seem  to  have  any  appreciable  effect  on  these
            two  constituents.  The  Mg  ion  concentration  increases  about  1.5  times  with  increasing
            pressure.  The  absolute  values,  however,  are  lower  at  high  temperatures  than  at  low
            temperatures.  The  concentration  of  K +,  Li +,  I-,  and  HCO~- were  higher  in  solutions
            expelled at higher temperatures, whereas that of SO 2-  was  slightly lower.
               Krasintseva  and  Korunova  (1968)  studied  the  variations  in  chemistry  of  solutions
            expelled  from  unlithified  Black  Sea  marine  muds.  At  room  temperature,  the  C1-
            concentration  decreased  with  increasing  pressure,  whereas  the  concentration  of  some
            other components  went through  a maximum at pressures  of 500  to  1000 kg/cm 2 (49  to
            98.1  MPa)  (Fig.  10-15).  Fig.  10-16  shows  the  relationship  between  the  concentration
            of various  ions  and  compaction pressure  at  80~  for the  same marine mud.  The  results
            further  demonstrate  that  at  a  temperature  of  80~  the  amount  of  Mg 2+  is  less  than
            that  at room  temperature  and  does  not  change  much  with increasing  pressure.  No  such
            behavior was noted for Ca 2+ (Fig.  10-16).
               Shishkina  (1968)  did  not  observe  any  appreciable  change  in  the  chemistry  of  the
            squeezed-out pore waters up to a pressure of 1260 kg/cm 2 (123.6 MPa) in some samples
            and up to a pressure of 3000 kg/cm 2 (294.2 MPa) in others from the Atlantic and Pacific
            oceans  and  from  the  Black  Sea.  There  was  some  increase  in  Ca 2+  concentration  at
            a  pressure  range  of  675-1080  kg/cm 2  (66.2-105.9  MPa).  This  was  followed  by  a
            decrease  at  higher  pressures.  Shishkina  (1968)  stated  that  at  compaction  pressures,  at
            which  80  to  85%  of  pore  water  is  expelled,  there  are  no  changes  in  concentration.
            Manheim (1966)  also noted that pressures ranging from approximately 4 to  85  MPa did
            not appreciably affect the ion concentrations in expelled pore water.
               Chilingar  et  al.  (1969)  saturated  two  samples  of  smectite  clay  (API  No.  25)  with
            seawater and  squeezed  the  pore  waters  at pressures  which  were  raised rapidly  to  5000
            psi in the first case and to  10,000  psi in the  second  case  (corresponding  to about 35  and
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286