Page 432 - Orlicky's Material Requirements Planning
P. 432

410                                                 PART 4      Looking Backward and Forward


           FIGURE 24-3

           Purchased-part lead time.


          Number of Parts








                       10           20          30          40           50          60
                                          Lead Time Days

        Chapter 23, two of these lead times, manufacturing lead time (MLT) and cumulative lead
        time (CLT), are most often unrealistic, either an underestimation or an overestimation,
        respectively. To this extent, actively synchronized replenishment lead time (ASRLT) is
        best used to determine what is short, medium, and long. Figure 24-4 provides an exam-
        ple of what the difference in distribution may look like among MLT, CLT, and ASRLT.
        Clearly, this affects what planning personnel view as short, medium, and long.
             Figure 24-5 represents an example of short, medium, and long designation against
        the distribution of manufacturing parts chosen for replenishment.
             Short   1 to 10 days.
             Medium   11 to 25 days.
             Long   26  days.


               Factor 4: Significant Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ)
        Ordering policies, including order minimums, maximums, and multiples, complicate
        planning and supply scenarios but are a fact of life for planners. Many of these ordering
        policies are based on valid data and sound assumption; some are not. It is a given that
        there will be parts/SKUs that do require minimum order quantities. Minimum order
        quantities (MOQs) can affect buffer levels and zones. Significant MOQs definitely will
        affect buffer levels and zones. The qualifying characteristics of what makes an MOQ sig-
        nificant will be examined later in this chapter. Additionally, frequently, times with MOQs
        also will be designated long-lead-time parts/SKUs.
             Based on these four factors, there are 54 potential buffer profiles. Depending on the
        manufacturing environment, there could be even more derivations and permutations
        than this. If there is a certain global attribute that makes sense by which parts should be
        grouped that is not related to variability, lead time, part type, and order quantity, then
        another type of buffer profile should be explored. Figure 24-6 details the 54 different
        buffer profile combinations. Each buffer profile has been designated with a code based
   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437