Page 305 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources

13/282 Stations and Surface Facilities
3.0 pts [Adequate Hazard Analyses]-Semiformal analyses 3.0 pts [Adequate Lighting System]-System is effective and
exists that meet all company and industry minimum recom- meets industry and company required or recommended
mended or required hazard analysis best practices lighting system best practices
8.0 pts [Inadequate Hazard Analyses]-Informal analyses 8.0 pts [Inadequate Lighting System]-System is not effective
exists that do not meet all company and industry minimum and does not meet industry and company required or recom-
recommended or required hazard analysis best practices mended lighting system best practices
10.0 pts [No Hazard Analyses]-No known analyses exist and 10.0 pts [No Lighting System]-No system exists
few company and industry minimum recommended or 5.0 pts [Unknown Lighting System]
required hazard analysis best practices are met
5.0 pts [Unknown Hazard Analyses] [Protective Barriers]- Evaluation of various station third-
party and vehicle access barriers, including railings, 6-ft chain-
[Critical Equipment Security]- Evaluation of security for link fence, barbed wire, walls, ditches, chains, and locks.
critical or key facility equipment and systems access, including Barrier appropriateness, adequacy for conditions, strength,
building locks, locks, keys, chains, protocols, etc. coverage completeness, and PPM are evaluated.

0.0 pts [NotApplicable] 0.0 pts [NotApplicable]
1 .O pts [Excellent Equipment Security]-All critical equipment 1 .O pts [Excellent Protective Barriers]-Barriers are very
is well secured, marked, and maintained in a manner exceed- effective and exceed industry and company required or rec-
ing industry and company best practices (or is not needed) ommended best practices (or are not necessary)
3.0 pts [Adequate Equipment Security]-All critical equip- 3.0 pts [Adequate Protective Barriers]-Barriers are effective
ment is secured, marked, and maintained to meet industry and meet industry and company required or recommended
and company best practices best practices
10.0 pts [Inadequate Equipment Security]-Equipment and 8.0 pts [Inadequate Protective Barriers]-Barriers are not
materials are not well secured, marked, and/or maintained to effective and do not meet industry and company required or
meet industry and company best practices recommended best practices
5.0 pts [Unknown Equipment Security] 10.0 pts mo Protective Barriers]-No barriers exist
5.0 pts [Unknown Protective Barriers]
Outside force algorithm variables
Outside force susceptibility
Site Security Mitigation
[Severe Weather]- Evaluation of various hazardous weather
[Security Detection Systems]- Evaluation of various station events, including extreme rainfall, floods, freezing, hail, ice,
security detection systems and equipment, including gadflame snow, lightning, and/or winds. The hazardous event potential is
detectors, motion detectors, audio/video surveillance, etc. determined by historical frequency, severity, duration, and
Security system appropriateness, adequacy for service condi- damage caused.
tions, coverage completeness, and PPM are evaluated.
0.0 pts [Not Applicable]
0.0 pts [NotApplicable] 2.0 pts [Low Severe Weather Potentiall-Low potential of one
1 .O pts [Excellent Security Detection Systems]-Systems are or more severe weather events occurring during an average
very effective and exceed industry and company required or year with the potential to cause significant facility damage
recommended security detection systems best practices (or 5.0 pts [Moderate Severe Weather Potentiall-Moderate
are not needed) potential of one or more severe weather events occurring
3.0 pts [Adequate Security Detection Systems]-Systems are during an average year with the potential to cause significant
effective and meet industry and company required or recom- facility damage
mended security detection systems best practices 10.0 pts [High Severe Weather Potentiall-High potential of
8.0 pts [Inadequate Security Detection Systems]-Systems are one or more severe weather events occurring during an
not effective and do not meet industry and company required average year with the potential to cause significant facility
or recommended security detection systems best practices damage
10.0 pts [No Security Detection Systems]-No systems exist 5.0 pts [Unknown Severe Weather Potential]
5.0 pts [Unknown Security Detection Systems]
[Ground Movemen+ Evaluation of various hazardous
Fighting Systems]- Evaluation of various station lighting ground movement events, including severe earthquakes, erosion,
systems, including security and perimeter systems and equip- washouts, expansive soil movement, frost heave, landslide, sub-
ment and working areas. System appropriateness, adequacy sidence or blasting. The hazardous event potential is determined
for service conditions, coverage completeness, and PPM are by historical frequency, severity, duration, and damage caused.
evaluated.
0.0 pts [NotApplicable]
0.0 pts [Not Applicable] 2.0 pts [Low Ground Movement Potentiall-Low potential of
1.0 pts [Excellent Lighting System]-System is very effective one or more severe ground movement events occurring dur-
and exceeds industry and company required or recom- ing an average year with the potential to cause significant
mended lighting system best practices (or are not needed) facility damage