Page 123 - Renewable Energy Devices and System with Simulations in MATLAB and ANSYS
P. 123

110             Renewable Energy Devices and Systems with Simulations in MATLAB  and ANSYS ®
                                                                                ®

              All MPPT methods presented in this section are suitable to accommodate a constant-power-mode
            control scheme [5], except the constant-voltage, constant-current, ANN-based and single-sensor
            MPPT techniques, since, due to the types of sampled parameters, which are employed in these
            methods, they do not comprise the sensors required to facilitate the measurement of the PV output
            power.

            5.4  MPPT METHODS FOR PV ARRAYS OPERATING UNDER
                 NONUNIFORM SOLAR IRRADIATION CONDITIONS
            When the individual modules of the PV array receive unequal amount of solar irradiation, the power–
            voltage characteristic of the PV source exhibits multiple MPPs as their positions change frequently
            under the influence of stochastically varying meteorological conditions. In such circumstances, the
            target of an MPPT process is to derive, among the individual local MPPs of the PV source, the
            global MPP where the overall power production of the PV array is optimized. Multiple alternative
            techniques have been developed in the past, which are suited for application under nonuniform solar
            irradiation conditions (see Figure 5.4), and their operating principles are described and  compared
            in the following.

            5.4.1  PV Array Reconfiguration

            In order to increase the power, which, for example, is supplied to a constant resistive load by a PV
            array operating under partial shading conditions, the use of a matrix of power switches has been
            proposed in [59]. Using this matrix, the connections between the PV cells/modules are dynamically
            modified, such that the PV strings comprise PV cells/modules operating under similar solar irradia-
            tion conditions.
              The PV array reconfiguration method has the disadvantages of higher implementation complex-
            ity and cost due to the high number of power switches required but increases the energy production
            of the PV array. According to [6], since the power–voltage curve of the PV array after reconfigura-
            tion may still exhibit local MPPs, a power converter executing one of the global MPPT algorithms
            presented in the following should be connected at the output of the PV source, in order to optimize
            the generated power.

            5.4.2  Evolutionary MPPT Algorithms

            In this class of MPPT techniques, the MPPT process is treated as an optimization problem, where
            the optimal value of the decision variable is calculated in real time, such that the objective  function,
            which corresponds to the power–voltage curve of the PV source, is optimized.  Thus,   various
              alternative evolutionary optimization algorithms, which in some cases have been inspired from
              biological and natural processes, have been applied for that purpose. A generalized flowchart of an
            evolutionary algorithm for implementing an MPPT process is shown in Figure 5.14a. Initially, the
            designer specifies the values of the optimization algorithm operational  parameters, which define
            the speed and accuracy of convergence to the global optimum solution. During the execution of the
            optimization/MPPT process, multiple sets of values of the decision variable are produced in a way
            defined by the operating principle of the specific optimization algorithm, which has been employed.
            By appropriately controlling the power converter, the PV source is set to  operate at alternative oper-
            ating points corresponding to each of these sets (e.g., PV array output  voltage levels V 1 −  in the
                                                                                    V k
            power–voltage curve shown in Figure 5.14b). At each operating point, the power generated by the
            PV source is measured (i.e., the objective function of the optimization problem is evaluated) and
            compared to the power produced at other operating points (e.g., PV array output power levels P 1 −
                                                                                         P k
            in Figure 5.14b). This process is iteratively repeated, until a convergence criterion has been satisfied,
            which indicates that the position of the global MPP on the power–voltage curve has been derived
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128