Page 137 - Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology
P. 137

Statistics and Data Analysis in  Geology - Chapter 5

             a x2 test exactly like that used to check the fit of  the Poisson model.  Again, it is
             necessary to combine the final three categories so a frequency of  five or more is
             obtained. The test statistic is x2 = 4.82, with (5 - 2  = 3) degrees of  freedom. This
             is less than the critical value of  x2 for  o(  = 0.05 and v  = 3, so we  cannot reject
             the negative binomial as a model of  the spatial distribution of  discovery wells in
             the eastern part of  the Permian Basin. Keep in mind that this is not equivalent to
             proof that the wells do follow a negative binomial model, because it is possible that
             some other clustered model might provide an even better fit. However, the negative
             binomial does generate a spatial distribution that is statistically indistinguishable
             from the one observed.

              Nearest- neig h bor an a lysis
             An alternative to quadrat analysis is nearest-neighbor analysis. The data used are
             not the numbers of points within subareas, but the distances between closest pairs
             of points.  Since it is not necessary to select a quadrat size, nearest-neighbor pro-
             cedures avoid the possibility of  finding that a pattern is random at one scale but
             not  at another.  Also, since there are usually many more pairs of  nearest  neigh-
             bors than quadrats, the analysis is more sensitive. A good introduction to nearest-
             neighbor techniques is given by Getis and Boots (1978). Ripley (1981) provides a
             review of theory and applications in several fields, as do Cliff and Ord (1981). Shaw
              and Wheeler (1994) and B&ley and Gatrell(1995) discuss computational aspects of
             neares t-neighbor analyses.
                  Nearest-neighbor analysis compares characteristics of  the observed set of  dis-
              tances between pairs of  nearest points with those that would be expected if  the
             points were randomly placed.  The characteristics of  a theoretical random pattern
              can be derived from the Poisson distribution.  If  we ignore the effect of  the edges
              of  our map, the expected mean distance between nearest neighbors is

                                              -1
                                              s’2m                                  (5.24)

             where A is the area of  the map and n is the number of  points. You will recall that
              A/n is the point density, A.  The sampling variance of  is given by


                                                                                    (5.25)

              If we work out the constants.

                                                 0.06831 A
                                            g;  =                                   (5.26)
                                                     n2
              The standard error of  the mean distance between nearest neighbors is the square
              root of  CT;
                                                  0.26136
                                                   4-
                                             se =                                   (5.27)
                                -
              The distribution of  6 is normal provided n is greater than 6, so we  can use the
              simple z-test given in Chapter  2  to  test  the hypothesis that the observed  mean

              310
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142