Page 143 - Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology
P. 143

Statistics and Data Analysis in  Geology - Chapter 5

             treated as though they occurred along a single, straight sampling line.  This and
             other methods for investigating the density of  patterns  of  lines are reviewed by
             Getis and Boots (1978). A computer program for computing nearest-neighbor dis-
             tances, orientation, and other statistical measures of  patterns of  lines is given by
             Clark and Wilson (1994).



             Analysis of Directional Data

             Directional data are an important category of geologic information. Bedding planes,
             fault  surfaces,  and joints  are  all  characterized by  their  attitudes,  expressed  as
             strikes and dips.  Glacial striations, sole marks, fossil shells, and water-laid peb-
             bles may have preferred orientations. Aerial and satellite photographs may show
             oriented linear patterns. These features can be measured and treated quantitatively
             like measurements of  other geologic properties, but it is necessary to use special
             statistics that reflect the circular (or spherical) nature of  directional data.
                 Following the practice of  geographers, we can distinguish between directional
             and oriented features. Suppose a car is traveling north along a highway; the car’s
             motion has direction, while the highway itself has only a north-south  orientation.
             Strikes of  outcrops and the traces of  faults are examples of  geologic observations
             that are oriented, while drumlins and certain fossils such as high-spired gastropods
             have clear directional characteristics.
                 We  may also  distinguish observations  that  are distributed on a circle, such
             as paleocurrent measurements, and those that are distributed spherically, such as
             measurements of  metamorphic fabric. The former data are conventionally shown
             as  rose  diagrams, a form of  circular histogram, while  the latter are plotted  as
             points on a projection of  a hemisphere.  Although geologists have plotted direc-
             tional measurements in these forms for many years, they have not used formal
             statistical techniques extensively to test the veracity of  the conclusions they have
             drawn from their diagrams.  This is doubly unfortunate; not only are these statis-
             tical tests useful, but the development of  many of  the procedures was originally
             inspired by problems in the Earth sciences.
                 Figure 5-13  is a map of  glacial striations measured in a small area of  south-
             ern Finland; the measurements  are listed in Table  5-4  and contained in file FIN-
             LAND.TXT. The directions indicated by the striations can be expressed by plotting
             them as unit vectors or on a circle of unit radius as in Figure 5-14  a. If  the circle is
             subdivided into segments and the number of vectors within each segment counted,
             the results can be expressed as the rose diagram, or circular histogram, shown as
             Figure 5-14  b.
                 Nemec (1988) pointed  out that many of  the rose diagrams published by ge-
             ologists violate the basic principal on which histograms are based and, as a con-
             sequence, the diagrams are visually misleading.  Recall that areas of  columns in a
             histogram are proportional to the number (or percentage) of observations occurring
             in the corresponding intervals. For a rose diagram to correctly represent a circular
             distribution, it must be constructed so that the areas of  the wedges (or “petals”) of
             the diagram are proportional to class frequencies.  Unfortunately, most rose dia-
             grams are drawn so that the radii of the wedges are proportional to frequency. The
             resulting distortion may suggest the presence of  a strong directional trend where
             none exists (Fig. 5-15).

             316
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148