Page 246 - Sustainability in the Process Industry Integration and Optimization
P. 246

E x a m p l e s  a n d Ca s e  S t u d i e s   223


                       cooler through a heat recovery exchanger. The temperatures, which will vary
                       with the amount of heat shifted, are also indicated in the figure.
                         The expressions for the variation in the affected heat loads and temperatures
                       in response to a shifted load of X kW are displayed in Eqs. (10.1)–(10.8) (notation
                       as in Figure 10.4):
                                                 -
                             Cooler C3 load:  Q C3  = 5970 X               (10.1)
                             Temperature of stream C1: T C11  =  247+ X  /100  (10.2)
                             Heater H8 load:  Q H8  =  5300- X             (10.3)
                                                       +
                             Exchanger E1 heat load:  E  = 14700 X         (10.4)
                                                E1
                                                         -
                             Temperature 1 of stream H1: T  = 190 X /100   (10.5)
                                                   H11
                             Output temperature of C2:  T  = 164           (10.6)
                                                  C2,out
                             Input temperature of C2:  C2,in  = 35         (10.7)
                                               T
                             Temperature 1 of stream H1: 99.7 X   /100     (10.8)
                       Answer to (b)(2). The temperature differences should be checked at the affected
                       heat exchangers, which are E1 and E2. As can be seen, the heat capacity flow
                       rate (CP) values for both streams in E1 are equal to 100 kW/°C. Exchanger E2’s
                       hot stream has a higher CP value than that for the cold stream, so the smaller
                       temperature difference will be at its hot end. This allows one to calculate the
                       maximum amount of the load X to shift by solving a few inequalities. For
                       process exchanger E2, the temperature difference should not be less than
                       ΔT  , and this determines the value of the maximum heat load that can be
                         min
                       shifted:
                                     T  – T   ≥ ∆T                         (10.9)
                                      H11   C2,out  min
                                     190 – X/100 – 164 ≥ 10               (10.10)

                                     X≤ 2600 kW                           (10.11)
                       For this value of load shift, the exchanger E2 will be pinched at its hot end as
                       follows: T  = 174.0°C and T   = 164.0°C. The temperatures at the cold end
                              H11          C2,out
                       will be T   = 83.7°C and T   = 35.0°C.
                             H12          C2, in
                       Answer to (c)(1). Total heating requirement for the existing network:
                       Σ Q  = Q  + Q  = 27,700 kW. Total cooling requirement for the network:
                          H   H8  H9
                       Σ Q  = Q  + Q  + Q   = 21,345 kW. There is no inappropriate use of utilities.
                          C  C3  C6   C10
                       Compared with the targets, both total utility heating and total utility cooling
                       are higher by 9920 kW, which is due to cross-Pinch heat transfer.
                       Answer to (c)(2). The Process Pinch is at 150°C for hot streams and at 140°C for
                       cold streams. Comparing the network temperatures with the Pinch location
                       yields a list of exchangers that violate the Pinch; see Table 10.2.
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251