Page 296 - Sustainability in the Process Industry Integration and Optimization
P. 296

I n d u s t r i a l  A p p l i c a t i o n s  a n d Ca s e  S t u d i e s   273


                     turbines (ranging from 11.7 to 85.4 MW) were estimated using data
                     from Gas Turbine World (2001).
                        The preliminary Total Site targets estimated minimum utility
                     demand of about 80 t/h for the winter scenario, leading to the choice
                     of a field-erected boiler for stand-alone steam generation. A gas
                     turbine with a Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) is also selected.
                     For this case, three steam mains (headers) were considered: one for
                     very-high-pressure (VHP) steam generated by the boiler and by the
                     HRSG, and two more intermediate steam mains. The VHP header
                     properties were specified by the problem definition and are given in
                     Table 11.4. Hence, locations for the two other headers still have to be
                     determined. Figure 11.13 illustrates the partitioning of the candidate
                     steam levels, whose ranges are highlighted. For the upper steam
                     main, this graph was used to identify three candidate levels with
                     respective saturation temperatures of 270.68°C, 209.15°C, and
                     198.89°C; the only candidate for the lower steam main there has a
                     saturation temperature of 130.51°C. The problem superstructure is
                     illustrated in Figure 11.14.
                        Optimizing and reducing the superstructure yields the flowsheet
                     shown in Figure 11.15. It features two fired steam boilers and one
                     steam turbine sized to the steam flow for the winter period. This
                     flowsheet features relatively low on-site power generation and a
                     significant amount of power import. The main reasons behind this
                     approach are that power is cheap and capital is expensive; these
                     factors preclude a better utilization of the steam system’s potential
                     cogeneration. This design also involves a significant amount of CO
                                                                              2
                     emissions.


                                     Gas turbines
                                 gt 01      gt 01
                                                                      Process heating
                      Process cooling                                  demands
                       demands                           b 01  b 02   Winter Summer
                                      HRSG       HRSG
                      Winter  Summer
                                VHP: 90 bara, 503.35 °C                3.550  3.175
                      12.000 16.885                                    MW  MW
                       MW  MW                            Canditate
                                     hdr : st   hdr : st
                                       01  01    01  02  pressure levels  9.038  5.956
                                                                       MW  MW
                      7.700  13.383  hdr
                       MW  MW      01                 tb 01
                                                        tb 02         1.635  1.501
                      1.300  2.877                        tb 03        MW  MW
                       MW  MW
                                     hdr : st   hdr : st              50.591  43.777
                      15.500 18.136  hdr  : tb    02  01  02  02       MW  MW
                       MW  MW      02  01
                                                                      14.660  10.632
                                                                       MW  MW
                       8.210  10.632            CT: st     CT: st
                       MW  MW                      01        02
                                        COND: 0.1235 bara
                                                                    Condensate return
                      To cooling water
                                   DA             Make-up water
                       To the stream generators
                     FIGURE 11.14  Superstructure of the industrial utility system.
   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301