Page 69 - The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs
P. 69

-  RESISTIVITY  AND  CONDUCTIVITY  LOGS  -




                         RESISTIVITY  SFL  om  m? sm
                    2     1,0         190      100,             20  |
                    ras
                      oy
                         isl
                              po
                                            Dl
                                         st
                                el
                                                                          —
                   R  SFL                                    z   15  |  J
                                                             B  ~   10 |  4  1
                                                                                  ly
                                                                         "ore
                                                                                      og
                                                                                    a
                                                                         «
                                                                             ave
                                                                                 Ioo@
                                                                              .
                                                                                3
                                                             2
                                                                                      oa
                                                                                 emo
                                                                             «
                                                             oO
                                                             a
                                                                                    ba



                                                                                  oa
                                                                 5  |
                                                                                    oo
                                                                              *
                                                                                    «og
                                                                                              a  of o
                                                                                           3
                                                  r25m
                                                                              .
                                                                                             “ne
                                                                 0   4  J  7
                                                                                      —
                                                                       St
                                                                                            es
                               a“   poroshly
                                                                  10            100           1000
                                                                              resistivity  Ryo/Rmi
                                                                   -   bimodal  porosity  system

          =
          bs                                                       oO   unimodal  porosity  system
          é  S                                    60m
          o                                                 Figure  6.26  Textural  patterns  indicated  on  the  resistivity  log
          yn
          2                                                 in  the  Rodessa  Limestone,  East  Texas.  Porosity  is  density-log
          2                                                 derived:  resistivity  is  from  the  shallow  laterolog.  (From  Keith
                                            |
                             {
                                    T
                                        q
                                 q
                                    205
                                250
                                           10
                             30
                         SANDSTONE  POROSITY  ©
                                         %
                                                            and  Pittman,  1983).
                                                            smal]  in  absolute  terms,  but  are  still  sufficient  to  affect  the
         Figure  6.24  The  close  relationship  between  resistivity  and
         porosity  in  a  water-bearing  sandstone.  Resistivity  from   high  resolution  resistivity  tools  such  as  the  dipmeter  and
         spherically  focused  log,  SFL:  porosity  is  log-derived.   the  electrical  imaging  tools.  Indeed,  they  are  the  basis  for
                                                            the  existence  of  such  a  thing  as  an  electrical  image
         and  porosity  is  only  one  element  of  it  (Figure  6.5).  The   (Chapter  13).
         chosen  example  (Figure  6.5),  illustrated  F  as  sensitive   The  geological  importance  of  the  link  between  F  and
         to  grain  shape,  which  it  was  suggested,  showed  F  to  be   resistivity  in  terms  of  texture,  and  the  way  in  which  this
         texturally  related  (Section  6.2).  But  shape  is  just  one  ele-   may  be  exploited,  is  nicely  shown  by  the  following
         ment  of  texture.  Others  such  as  size,  composition,   example.
         orientation  and  arrangement  (sorting)  also  have  their   The  Rodessa  limestone  of  the  East  Texas  Basin  shows
         influence  on  F,  and  hence  — resistivity  (Figure  6.25).  In   different  porosity  characteristics  in  different  sub-facies,
         reality,  every  lamina  has  a  different  texture  to  the  next,  a   depending  on  grain  type.  Ooid  limestones  tend  to  have
         different  F  value.  The  changes  in  texture  (and  F)  may  be   bimodal  porosity,  skeletal  limestones  tend  to  have

                                  Compositlon
                          rantsons  SSRI
                             shala   17  =
                                S8EE5
                                                —_
                                Shape                        Orentation
                              a             8
                                                           EE
                                RROD
                                      O
                                  OS
                              £0  S299                     SES
                                       Arrangement                          KEY
                                      POSSE  OBIS  SOOO  CO DOOOSOO SS   Os   Quartz  grains
                                                                              shale

                                                                        —
                                                                              bedding/
                                                                              lamination  planes

         Figure  6.25  The  influence  of  texture  on  the  formation  resistivity  factor,  F.  Each  thin  bed  or  lamina  has  a  different  F  value.
         This  figure  should  be  compared  to  Figures  6.4  and  6.5  (modified  from  Nurmi,  1984).
                                                        59
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74