Page 330 - The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing
P. 330

306                                                              Index

              emphasis of, 194; good habits,    company sales, 143–144;
              194; relativism and, 194; role    conclusion concerning, 144–145;
              models, 194; shortcoming of, 194  definition of, 130; definition of
            Voice to Values (GVV), 197          word of mouth and early word-of-
                                                mouth research, 130–132;
            Wallack, L., & Dorfman. L., 246, 270  diffusion of information, 134, 135;
            Wallack, L., & Lawrence, R., 261,   efficacy of, 130; embedded
              262, 270                          marketing message, criteria for
            Wallack, L. L., Dorfman, L., Jernigan,   effective, 140; ethos/pathos, 130;
              D. H., & Themba-Nixon, M., 255,   evolution of the theory of WOM,
              270                               133–136; “eWOM,” 132;
            Ward, Lester F., 164–165, 174       Facebook, 137; as a feedback
            wastefulness and social marketing,   mechanism, 142; “focus-related
              185                               utility,” 133; heterophilous
            “water-cooler effect,” 129          relationships, 135; homophilous
            Watson, John B., 157                communication, 135; homophily,
            Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S., 136, 149  138; impact of negative WOM,
            wealth redistribution, 167, 169     140–142; impact of WOM on
            Web 2.0 social media, 144           marketing strategy using social
            Webb, J., 157, 158, 174             media, 143–144; importance of,
            Weber, Max, 154, 174                131; informational influence, 138;
            welfare policies and social standing,   information dissemination, 142;
              262                               Internet social networking, 136–
            Wheeler, S. C., Petty, R. E., & Bizer,   137; Internet social networking site
              G. Y., 45, 46, 58                 (SNS), 137; interpersonal
            White Jacket (Melville), 129        influence, 131, 135, 138;
            Whyte, J. W., 131, 149              introduction to, 129–130; linear
            Wiebe, G. D., 2, 11, 14, 26         marketer influence model, 134;
            Wiener, Josh, 292                   LinkedIn, 137; logos, 130;
            Wilkie, W. L., & Moore, E. S., 2, 11,   marketing and, 130, 132, 134–
              18, 26                            135; as a marketing strategy, 130;
            Winett, L. B., & Wallack, L., 242,   as a model of “organic inter-
              252, 270                          consumer influence,” 133;
            Winfrey, Oprah, lawsuit against, 281  motivation for information
            Wisconsin Advertising Project.      dissemination, 133; negative
              (2008), 115, 128                  consumer comments, 133; network
            Worcester, R. M., & Mortimore, R.,   co-production model, 134;
              111, 128                          nominative influence, 138;
            word of mouth (WOM): vs.            “payback,” 133; perceived WOM
              advertising and promotion, 130;   quality, 139; perceptions of,
              altruism, 133; approval utility, 139;   130; prediction and, 141–142; On
              brand familiarity, 141, 142;      Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse
              characteristics of, 130;          (Aristotle), 52, 129–130; rumor,
              characterization of, 129, 130; and   definition of, 143; rumor and,
   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335