Page 130 - The Mechatronics Handbook
P. 130

the interconnection of these elements would describe how power flows between them. Some of the details
                                 for accomplishing these modeling steps are presented in later sections.
                                   One way to proceed is to define and categorize types of system elements based on the reticulated
                                 energy continuity Eq. (9.1). For example, consider a system made up only of rigid bodies as energy stores
                                 (in particular of kinetic energy) for which P d  = 0 (we can add these later), and in general there can be l
                                 ports that could bring energy into this purely (kinetic)energy-storing system which has m distinct ways
                                 to put energy into the rigid bodies. This is a very general concept, consistent with many other ways to
                                 model physical systems. Howevever, it is this foundation that provides for a generalized way to model
                                 and integrate different types of energetic systems.
                                   The schematic of a permanent-magnet dc (PMDC) motor shown in Fig. 9.1(b) illustrates how power
                                 variables would be used to identify inteconnection points. This example also serves to identify the need
                                 for modeling mechanisms, such as the electromechanical (EM) interaction, that can represent the
                                 exchange of energy between two parts of a system. This model represents a simplified relationship between
                                 electrical power flow, v · i, and mechanical power flow, T · ω, which forms the basis for a motor model.
                                 Further, this is an ideal power-conserving relationship that would only contain the power flows in the
                                 energy continuity equation; there are no stores or dissipators.  Additional physical effects would be
                                 included later.


                                 Power and Signal Flow
                                 In a bond graph formulation of the PMDC motor, a power bond is used to identify flow of power. Power
                                 bonds quantify power flow via an effort-flow pair, which can label the bonds as shown in Fig. 9.2(a)
                                 (convention calls for the effort to take the position above for any orientation of bond). This is a word
                                 bond graph model, a form used to identify the essential components in a complex system model. At this
                                 stage in a model, only the interactions of multiport systems are captured in a general fashion. Adding
                                 half-arrows on power bonds defines a power flow direction between two systems (positive in the direction
                                 of the arrow). Signal bonds, used in control system diagrams, have full-arrows and can be used in bond
                                 graph models to indicate interactions that convey only information (or negligible power) between
                                 multiports. For example, the word bond graph in Fig. 9.2(b) shows a signal from the mechanical block
                                 to indicate an ideal measurement transferred to a controller as a pure signal. The controller has both
                                 signal and power flow signals, closing the loop with the electrical side of the model. These conceptual
                                 diagrams are useful for understanding and communicating the system interconnections but are not
                                 complete or adequate for quantifying system performance.



                                          Controlled  v  Electrical  v         T   Mechanical  T  Mechanical
                                          Electrical    (Armature)      EM          Rotational   Rotational
                                           Power    i     Circuit  i   Coupling  w  Dynamics  w    Load


                                                                      (a)      POWER bonds

                                                                    Controlled  v        T   Mechanical
                                                       Controller   Electrical    PMDC       Rotational
                                                                     Power   i    Model  w     Load

                                                                SIGNAL bond

                                                                      (b)


                                 FIGURE 9.2  Power-based bond graph models: (a) PMDC motor word bond graph, (b) PMDC motor word bond
                                 graph with controller.


                                 ©2002 CRC Press LLC
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135