Page 821 - The Mechatronics Handbook
P. 821

066_Frame_C26  Page 6  Wednesday, January 9, 2002  1:58 PM































                       FIGURE 26.6  Region of the desired closed-loop poles.
                                                  ≥
                                                                  ≤
                       The PO requirement implies that ζ   0.6, equivalently θ  53° (recall that cos(θ) = ζ). The settling time
                                                         ≤
                       requirement is satisfied if and only if Re(r 1,2 )  −0.5. Then, the region of desired closed-loop poles is the
                       shaded area shown in Fig. 26.6. The same figure also illustrates the region of desired closed-loop poles
                       for similar design requirements in the discrete time case.
                         If the order of the closed-loop transfer function  T(s) is higher than two, then, depending on the
                       location of its poles and zeros, it may be possible to approximate the closed-loop step response by the
                       response of a second-order system. For example, consider the third-order system

                                                          2
                                         Ts() =  ---------------------------------------------------------------  where  r >> zw o
                                                         w o
                                                              (
                                                 2
                                                            2
                                                ( s +  2zw o s + w o ) 1 + s/r)
                                                                                −zw t
                                                                                   o
                                                      −rt
                       The transient response contains a term e . Compared with the envelope e   of the sinusoidal term,
                       −rt
                       e  decays very fast, and the overall response is similar to the response of a second-order system. Hence,
                       the effect of the third pole r 3  = −r is negligible.
                         Consider another example,
                                                   w o 1 + s/ r +   )]
                                                           (
                                                     [
                                                     2
                                         Ts() =  --------------------------------------------------------------- where 0 <    << r
                                                            2
                                                              (
                                                 2
                                               ( s +  2zw o s +  w o ) 1 + s/r)
                       In this case, although r does not need to be much larger than ζω o , the zero at −(r +  ) cancels the effect
                       of the pole at −r. To see this, consider the partial fraction expansion of Y(s) = T(s)R(s) with R(s) = 1/s:
                                                             A 1
                                                                         A 3
                                                       A 0
                                                 Ys() =  ----- +  ------------ +  ------------ +  ----------
                                                                   A 2
                                                             –
                                                        s   sr 1  sr 2  s +  r
                                                                   –
                       where A 0  = 1 and
                                                                      2
                                                                             

                                          A 3 =  lim ( s + r)Ys() =  ------------------------------------------ ----------- 
                                                                    w o
                                                                           2 

                                                                        2
                                               s→  −r         2zw o r ( w o + r )  r + 
                                                                    –
                       Since  A 3 →  0  as   →  0 , the term A 3 e  is negligible in y(t).
                                                    −rt
                         In summary, if there is an approximate pole–zero cancellation in the left half plane, then this pole–zero
                       pair can be taken out of the transfer function T(s) to determine PO and t s . Also, the poles closest to the
                       ©2002 CRC Press LLC
   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826