Page 341 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 341

332                                  6. DECONVOLUTION

                                                             FIG. 6.19  Schematic illustration of calculation and
                                                             application of deconvolution with optimum Wiener
                                                             filters. (*) denotes convolution.






















              2                     3 2     3  2 3
                a 0  a 1  a 2  … a n 1           1      a mixed, maximum or zero phase wavelet. The
                                         h 0
                                                        method to calculate the minimum phase equiv-
              6                     7 6     7  6 7
                a 1  a 0  a 1
                                                        alent of a wavelet is to compute the inverse of its
              6              … a n 2 7 6  h 1  7  6  0 7
              6                     7 6     7  6 7
              6                     7 6     7  6 7
                                                 0
              6  a 2  a 1  a 0  … a n 3  7 6  h 2  7  6 7  spiking deconvolution operator (Yılmaz, 2001).
                                                           Fig.6.20showsanapplicationofstatisticaland
              6                     7 6     7  6 7
              6                     7 6     7  6 7
                 :   :    :       :      :       :
              6              …      7 6     7  ¼  6 7
                                                        deterministic Wiener spiking deconvolution to a
              6                     7 6     7  6 7
              6                     7 6     7  6 7
                 :   :    :       :      :       :      synthetic seismic trace consisting of a minimum
              6              …      7 6     7  6 7
              6                     7 6     7  6 7
                                                        phase wavelet. Although deterministic deconvo-
              6                     7 6     7  6 7
                                                 :
                 :   :    :
              6                     7 6  :  7  6 7
              4              …    : 5 4     5  4 5      lution produces almost perfect results, as
                                        h n 1    0      expected (Fig. 6.20C), it has very limited applica-
               a n 1 a n 2 a n 3 …  a 0
                                                        tion in seismic exploration because it requires the
                                                 (6.19)
                                                        source waveform to be known. Statistical decon-
           In fact, Wiener spiking deconvolution mathe-  volution today is a common technique in seismic
           matically equals to least-squares inverse filter-  processing and it produces satisfactory results,
           ing. The difference between them is that a   even if the source wavelet is not known, provid-
           known source wavelet is used in the calculation  ing that the seismogram is composed of a mini-
           of the autocorrelation matrix of normal equa-  mum phase wavelet (Fig. 6.20D). A similar
           tions in the case of least-squares inverse filtering  analysis is shown in Fig. 6.21, this time for a seis-
           (implying  a   deterministic  deconvolution),  mogram composed of a mixed phase wavelet.
           whereas this matrix is obtained from the seismic  Forbothstatisticalanddeterministicapproaches,
           trace itself in the case of Wiener spiking decon-  Wiener spiking deconvolution yields unaccept-
           volution (implying a statistical deconvolution).  able results for mixed phase wavelets.
           The amplitude spectrum of the Wiener spiking    As a result, if the source waveform is not
           deconvolution operator is approximately the  minimum phase, spiking deconvolution can-
           inverse of the amplitude spectrum of the source  not convert it into a zero-lag spike. For
           wavelet. This type of deconvolution can also be  instance, wavelet w(t)¼( 1, 2) cannot be con-
           used to derive the minimum phase equivalent of  verted into a zero-lag spike (1, 0, 0) by spiking
   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346