Page 484 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 484

10.4 SPECIFIC STACKING METHODS                      475




























           FIG. 10.16  Effect of stacking on the random noise suppression. (A) An NMO corrected synthetic CDP with 120 traces con-
           taminated by 50% random noise. (B) Stacked traces obtained using first 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, and 120 traces of CDP gather
           in (A), respectively. Increasing number of traces in stacking improves S/N ratio significantly.


           geometry requires nonzero offset data record-  both near and far offset traces are treated simi-
           ing. During the processing, source-receiver off-  larly and stacked all together. Amplitude varia-
           set is removed by NMO correction based on    tions depending on the offset or incidence
           the assumption that the reflections are of per-  angle of reflections in CDP traces are, however,
           fectly hyperbolic moveout. However, in some  considered to be a significant hydrocarbon indi-
           areas with irregular seafloor morphology and  cator and may incorporate important information
           complex subsurface geology as well as lateral  for the oil and gas industry. Estimation of pore
           velocity variations, reflections may not display  fluids in the possible subsurface reservoirs from
           hyperbolic behavior. In addition, due to the mul-  surface seismics requires knowledge of how the
           tiple reflections and conflicting dips, stack sec-  pore fluid saturation affects the signal ampli-
           tions and zero-offset sections are commonly  tudes. The variation of reflection amplitude with
           not equivalent.                              angle of incidence is known as amplitude versus
                                                        offset (AVO) and is explained in Section 12.6.Pos-
                                                        sible AVO effects on seismic data can quickly be
                 10.4 SPECIFIC STACKING                 analyzed by partial stacking of different offset
                          METHODS                       ranges independently. A common method to
                                                        obtain AVO information from surface seismic
                                                        data is to stack near and far offset traces in
           10.4.1 Partial Stack
                                                        CDP gathers separately, which generates angle
              Classical stacking of traces in a CDP gather  dependent stack sections. This method is known
           into the zero offset destroys the amplitude varia-  as partial stack or near/far offset stack, and if
           tions of the reflections with respect to the source-  computed in terms of the incidence angle, then
           receiver offset or incidence angle. This is because  it is termed angle stack.
   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489