Page 277 - Adsorbents fundamentals and applications
P. 277

262   CARBON NANOTUBES, PILLARED CLAYS, AND POLYMERIC RESINS

                     Vansant, 1995) have similar shapes, however the equilibrium amounts are about
                     30–40% when compared to activated carbon. Occelli et al. (1985) studied the
                     adsorption of normal paraffins on Al-PILC. Adsorption of nitrogen, water, n-
                     butane, methanol, and neo-pentane on Al-PILC and Zr-PILC has been investi-
                     gated by Stacey (1988).
                       Several strategies for PILC synthesis have been learned about achieving strong
                     interactions with sorbate molecules. One needs small pore sizes and cations that
                     have high valences as well as small ionic radii. The latter is for increasing
                     the field-induced dipole, field-dipole, and field gradient-quadrupole interactions
                     (see Chapter 2 and Chapter 7). To increase the density of cations, a clay with
                     a high CEC should be used as the starting clay. Treatment with ammonia, after
                     PILC synthesis and before cation exchange, will increase the CEC. The interlayer
                     d-spacing is controlled mainly by the size of the polynuclear cation used for
                     pillaring. Zr tetramers yield the smallest free interlayer spacing. Furthermore, the
                     free interlayer spacing can be decreased by calcining at a higher temperature. For
                     example, the d 001 spacing of Al-PILC decreased by approximately 1 ˚ A when the
                                                                ◦
                     calcination temperature was raised from 400 to 600 C (Cheng and Yang, 1997).

                     9.2.5. PILC and Acid-Treated Clay as Supports
                     In preparing catalysts and π-complexation sorbents, an inert support with a high
                     surface area is often needed. The supports are, however, not always “inert.” For
                     example, strong metal-support interactions are known in catalysis (Ruckenstein,
                     1987). The effects of different supports (silica vs. alumina) for π-complexation
                     by AgNO 3 have also been noted (Padin and Yang, 2000).
                       Pillared clays and acid-treated clays are two types of supports that have shown
                     interesting properties. They are discussed separately below.
                       Cheng and Yang (1995b) compared the adsorption properties for π-complexa-
                     tion of CuCl spread on two different supports, γ -Al 2 O 3 and TiO 2 -PILC. TiO 2 -
                     PILC was chosen because it has the largest pore dimensions among the different
                     PILCs. Both sorbents showed good olefin/paraffin selectivities. However, the
                     isotherms of olefins were more linear or steeper when TiO 2 -PILC was used as the
                     support. This effect is shown in Figure 9.22. Isotherm steepness is desirable since
                     the steep portion will yield a high working capacity for pressure swing adsorption.
                       Steepness of the isotherm beyond the “monolayer” region, that is, point “B”
                     or where the “knee” is located, is a direct reflection of the surface energy hetero-
                     geneity. Mathematically, the factor “s” in the Unilam (i.e., uniform Langmuir)
                     isotherm is an indicator of the steepness of this portion of the isotherm, and is
                     hence referred to as the heterogeneity parameter. The Unilam isotherm has been
                     discussed by Valenzuela and Myers (1989) and by Do (1998). It is given by:

                                                             +s
                                                 q m   c + Pe
                                             q =   ln                               (9.5)
                                                 2s    c + Pe −s
                     where q m is the “monolayer” amount adsorbed, P is the pressure, and c and s are
                     parameters. This isotherm is derived from the Langmuir isotherm by assuming
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282