Page 111 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 111

90                    Surprisingly, [1.1.1]propellane is somewhat more stable to thermal decomposition
                       than the next larger propellane, [2.1.1]propellane, indicating a reversal in the trend of
     CHAPTER 1         increased reactivity with increased strain. To understand this observation, it is important
     Chemical Bonding  to recognized that the energy of both the reactant and intermediate influence the rate of
     and Molecular Structure
                       unimolecular reactions that lead to decomposition. In the case of propellanes, homolytic
                       rupture of the central bond is expected to be the initial step in decomposition. This
                       bond rupture is very endothermic for [1.1.1]propellane. Because relatively less strain
                       is released in the case of [1.1.1]propellane than in the [2.1.1]- and [2.2.1]-homologs,
                       [1.1.1]propellane is kinetically most stable. 134




                            ΔH = +65 kcal/mol         +30 kcal/mol            +5 kcal/mol

                       Another manifestation of the relatively small release of strain associated with breaking
                       the central bond comes from MP4/6-31G calculations on the energy of the reverse
                                                         ∗
                       ring closure. 135
                                           H
                                                                   +   H
                                                            + 27 kcal/mol

                           The thermal decomposition of [1.1.1]propellane has been studied both experimen-
                       tally and by computation. 136  The initial product is 1,2-dimethylenecyclopropane, and
                       the E is 39.7 kcal/mol. The mechanism of the reactions has been studied using both
                            a
                       MO and DFT calculations. The process appears to be close to a concerted process,
                       which is represented in Figure 1.37. DFT computations suggest that structure A is
                       an intermediate, 137  slightly more stable than TS1 and TS2. The corresponding MO
                       calculations [CCSD(T)/6-311G(2d,p)] do not find a minimum. However, both methods
                       agree that A, TS1, and TS2 are all close in energy. Note that this reaction is heterolytic
                       and that the diradical is not an intermediate. This implies that there is a smaller barrier
                       for the observed reaction than for homolytic rupture of the central bond. The calculated
                       E is substantially less than the bond energy assigned to the bridgehead bond, which
                        a
                       implies that bond making proceeds concurrently with bond breaking, as expected for
                       a concerted process.

                                                          –               –
                                                                  +
                                      TS1
                                                    A              TS2


                       Visual models, additional information and exercises on Thermal Rearrangement
                       of [1.1.1]Propellane can be found in the Digital Resource available at:
                       Springer.com/carey-sundberg.

                       134
                          K. B. Wiberg, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 25, 312 (1985).
                       135   W. Adcock, G. T. Binmore, A. R. Krstic, J. C. Walton and J. Wilkie, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 2758
                          (1995).
                       136   O. Jarosch, R. Walsh, and G. Szeimies, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 8490 (2000).
                       137
                          . Both B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) and B3PW91/D95(d,p) computations were done and the latter were in
                          closer agreement with the CCSD(T)/6-311G(2d,p) results.
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116