Page 197 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 197

congested approach. 108  For example, NaBH and LiAlH deliver hydride by axial       177
                                               4          4
          approach to form mainly the equatorial alcohol. How do the differences in the
                                                                                          SECTION 2.4
          C−C bonds (on the axial side) as opposed to the C−H bonds (on the equatorial
          side) influence the stereoselectivity of cyclohexanone reduction? Torsional effects are  Stereoselective and
                                                                                    Stereospecific Reactions
          believed to play a major role in the preference for axial approach. In the reactant
          conformation, the carbonyl group is almost eclipsed by the equatorial C(2) and C(6)
          C−H bonds. This torsional strain is relieved by axial attack, whereas equatorial
          approach increases strain because the oxygen atom must move through a fully eclipsed
          arrangement. 109


                                         eclipsed interaction increases
                                         for equatorial approach
                      H                              equatorial      O –
                        H      axial            H                       H
                               approach              approach
                         O –                    O                        H
                      H                      H                       H


              The stereoselectivity can be reversed by using more sterically demanding reagents.
          More bulky reducing agents usually approach the cyclohexanone carbonyl from the
          equatorial direction. This is called steric approach control and is the result of van der
          Waals repulsions with the 3,5-axial hydrogens. Alkylborohydride reagents are used
          instead of NaBH , and alkoxy derivatives can be used in place of LiAlH . The bulkier
                        4
                                                                     4
          nucleophiles encounter the 3,5-axial hydrogens on the axial approach trajectory and
          therefore prefer the equatorial approach. 110  A large amount of data has been accumu-
          lated on the stereoselectivity of reduction of cyclic ketones. 111  Table 2.4 compares the
          stereochemistry of reduction of several ketones by hydride donors of increasing steric
          bulk. The trends in the data illustrate the increasing importance of steric approach
          control as both the hydride reagent and the ketone become more highly substituted. For
          example, the axial methyl group in 3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexanone favors an equatorial
          approach. The alkyl-substituted borohydrides have especially high selectivity for the
          less hindered direction of approach.
              The factors controlling the direction of reagent approach have also been studied
          in norbornan-2-ones. The stereochemistry of a number of reactions of the parent
          system and the 7,7-dimethyl derivative have been examined. 112  Some of the results are
          included in Table 2.4. These compounds reveal a reversal of the preferred direction of
          attack with the introduction of the 7,7-dimethyl substituents. In the parent system the
          exo direction of attack is preferred because the single CH group at C(7) offers less
                                                          2
          steric resistance than the −CH CH − unit on the endo side of the molecule. The endo
                                   2   2
          108
             B. W. Gung, Tetrahedron, 52, 5263 (1996).
          109	  M. Cherest, H. Felkin, and N. Prudent, Tetrahedron Lett., 2199 (1968); M. Cherest and H. Felkin,
             Tetrahedron Lett., 2205 (1968); Y. D. Wu and K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109, 906, 908 (1987);
             Y. D. Wu, K. N. Houk, and M. N. Paddon-Row, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 31, 1019 (1992).
          110
             W. G. Dauben, G. Fonken, and D. S. Noyce, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 78, 2579 (1956); H. C. Brown and
             W. C. Dickason, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92, 709 (1970); D. C. Wigfield, Tetrahedron, 35, 449 (1979);
             T. Wipke and P. Gund, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98, 8107 (1976).
          111	  D. C. Wigfield, Tetrahedron, 35, 449 (1979); D. C. Wigfield and D. J. Phelps, J. Org. Chem., 41, 2396
             (1976).
          112
             H. C. Brown, J. H. Kawakami, and K.-T. Liu J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95. 2209 (1973).
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202