Page 201 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 201

induction. More remote substituents can also affect the stereoselectivity of addition  181
          to the carbonyl group. For example, both  -methyl and  -siloxy substituents result in
          highly stereoselective reductions in ketones by trialkylborohydrides, but their directive  SECTION 2.4
          effects are opposite. 124  This is a case of 1,3-asymmetric induction.       Stereoselective and
                                                                                    Stereospecific Reactions
                   O   CH 3                 OH CH 3            OH CH 3
                            Li(sBu) BH               +
                                 3
                         β                        β                 R β
                                        ) CH
            (CH ) CH    R            (CH 3 2     R      (CH 3 ) 2 CH
              3 2
                                             92                  8
                  O   OTBDMS                    OH  OTBDMS           OH OTBDMS
                               Li(sBu) BH                   +              β
                                    3
           (CH ) CH    R β              (CH ) CH     R β      (CH ) CH    R
                                                                 3 2
              3 2
                                           3 2
                                                3                 97
          These results are attributed to alternative conformations of the reactant, with hydride
          attack being anti to the largest alkyl substituent in the methyl case and anti to the
          siloxy group in that case. The corresponding TSs are both of the Felkin-Ahn type
          in the sense that the large substituent is aligned perpendicularly with respect to the
          carbonyl group. In the methyl case, the favored TS minimizes the steric interaction
          of the isopropyl group with the   substituents. In the siloxy case, the favored TS
          has a stabilizing arrangement of the C=O and C−O dipoles and also avoids a steric

          interaction between the isopropyl group and R .

                                                  Nu –
                                       Nu –
                                 H     H           H     H
                                O      i Pr      i Pr    O

                                      H             H   R β
                                CH 3
                                     β
                                    R                 OSiR 3
              Another factor that affects stereoselectivity of carbonyl addition reactions is
          chelation. 125  If an   or   substituent can form a chelate with a metal ion involving
          the carbonyl oxygen, the stereoselectivity is usually governed by the chelated confor-
          mation. Complexation between a donor substituent, the carbonyl oxygen, and the
          Lewis acid can establish a preferred conformation for the reactant, which then controls
          reduction. Usually hydride is delivered from the less sterically hindered face of the
          chelate.
                 O                 O  M n+   –    H  OH             OH
                     R'        R     O      [H ]                  H    R'
               R                       R"               O
                                                   R       R"      R
                   OR"           R'                  R'               H OR"
          For example,  -hydroxy 126  and  -alkoxyketones 127  are reduced to anti 1,2-diols by
          Zn BH   via chelated TSs. This stereoselectivity is consistent with the preference for
                4 2
          124
             D. A. Evans, M. J. Dart, and J. L. Duffy, Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 8541 (1994).
          125	  D. J. Cram and K. R. Kopecky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81, 2748 (1959); D. J. Cram and D. R. Wilson,
             J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85, 1245 (1983).
          126	  T. Nakata, T. Tanaka, and T. Oishi, Tetrahedron Lett., 24, 2653 (1983).
          127
             G. J. McGarvey and M. Kimura, J. Org. Chem., 47, 5420 (1982).
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206