Page 379 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 379

360                     Scheme 3.7. Effect of Solvent Polarity on Reactions of Various Charge Types
                             1.  Neutralization of charge.
     CHAPTER 3
                                            −    +
     Structural Effects on       −    B → A----B → A −B   Favored by nonpolar solvent
                                       −
     Stability and Reactivity   A +
                             2.  Separation of charge.
                                         −    +
                                               −
                                A −B → A----B → A +B −    Favored by polar solvent
                             3.  Neutral reactants and products.
                                A +B → A----B → A −B      Relatively insensitive to solvent polarity
                             4.  Relative concentration of charge.
                                           +    +
                                 A −B  → A----B → A +B +  Slightly favored by polar solvent
                                     +
                             5.  Relative dispersal of charge.
                                          +    +
                                A +B → A----B →  A −B  +  Slightly favored by nonpolar solvent
                                 +
                       leaves the oppositely charge reactants in a more reactive state. Arguing along these
                       lines, the broad relationships between reactivity and solvent type shown in Scheme 3.7
                       can be deduced.
                           Many empirical measures of solvent polarity have been developed. 150  One of the
                       most useful is based on shifts in the absorption spectrum of a reference dye. The
                       position of absorption bands is sensitive to solvent polarity because the electronic
                       distribution, and therefore the polarity, of the excited state is different from that of the
                       ground state. The shift in the absorption maxima reflects the effect of solvent on the
                       energy gap between the ground state and excited state molecules. An empirical solvent
                       polarity measure called E (30) is based on this concept. 151  Some values for common
                                            T
                       solvents are given in Table 3.33 along with the dielectric constants for the solvents. It
                       can be seen that a quite different order of polarity is given by these two quantities.



                            Table 3.33. E (30), an Empirical Measure of Solvent Polarity, Compared with
                                      T
                                                  Dielectric Constant a
                                             E T (30)                       E T (30)
                            Water             63 1    78     DMF             43 8    37
                            Trifluoroethanol  59 5           Acetone         42 2    21
                            Methanol          55 5    32 7   Dichloromethane  41 1    8 9
                            80:20 Ethanol-water  53 7        Chloroform      39 1     4 8
                            Ethanol           51 9    24 5   Ethyl acetate   38 1     6 0
                            Acetic acid       51 2     6 1   THF             37 4     7 6
                            2-Propanol        48 6    19 9   Diethyl ether   34 6     4 3
                            Acetonitrile      46 7    38     Benzene         34 5     2 3
                            DMSO              45 0    47
                            From C. Reichardt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 18, 98 (1979)

                       150   C. Reichardt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 18, 98 (1979); C. Reichardt, Solvent Effects in Organic
                          Chemistry, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1990; J. Catalan, V. Lopez, P. Perez, R. Martin-Villamil, and
                          J. G. Rodriguez, Liebigs Ann., 241 (1995); C. Laurance, P. Nicolet, M. T. Dalati, J. L. M. Abboud, and
                          R. Notario, J. Phys. Chem., 98, 5807 (1994).
                       151
                          C. Reichardt and K. Dimroth, Fortshr. Chem. Forsch., 11, 1 (1968); C. Reichardt, Justus Liebigs Ann.
                          Chem., 752, 64 (1971).
   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384