Page 91 - Advances in Biomechanics and Tissue Regeneration
P. 91

86            5. IMPACT OF THE FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION MODELING ON THE HUMAN VESSEL HEMODYNAMICS

                        TABLE 5.3 Material Constants of the SEDF Developed in Kiousis et al. [36] Used for Modeling the
                                   Adventitia, the Media, and the Intima Layer of the Carotid Artery
                                            μ [kPa]           k 1 [kPa]         k 2 [2]         ρ [2]
                        Adventitia          0.44               0.146             105             0.8
                        Media               0.7                0.023             16.9            0.8
                        Intima              0.7                0.023             16.9            0.8


           where μ > 0 and k > 0 are stress-like parameters. k 2 > 0 and 0   ρ   1 are dimensionless parameters (when ρ ¼ 1 the
           fibers are perfectly aligned and when ρ ¼ 0 the fibers are randomly distributed so that the material is considered as
           isotropic), I 1 is the first invariant, and I 4 and I 6 are invariants that depend on the direction of the family of fibers at a
           material point. Two different material parameters were used for modeling the presented cases. The aortic wall was
           modeled as an anisotropic hyperelastic material with two families of fibers, oriented at  30.28 degrees, with respect
           to the circumferential direction, for the adventitia and media layer, respectively.

           5.2.8.2 Carotid Structural Modeling
              The material properties of the carotid structural model were based on the experimental data of Kiousis et al. [36].
           The material constants were fitted by the SEDF defined in [36] (see Table 5.3). The carotid artery wall was modeled as
           an anisotropic hyperelastic material with two families of fibers, oriented at  17.22 degrees [36].

           5.2.9 FSI Coupling and Numerical Modeling

              The simulations were run using the commercial software Adina (Adina R&D Inc., Watertown, MA). In this soft-
           ware, the FSI coupling can be performed after the creation of two models that separately include the fluid and the
           solid domain. The fluid domain was solved using a standard ALE formulation [37] while the solid domain used a
           typical Lagrangian formulation [38, 39]. Taking into account the moving reference velocity, the Navier-Stokes equa-
           tions for the fluid domain become
                                                                             B
                                              ρ F  ∂v F  + ρððv F  wÞ rÞv F  r   σ F ¼ f ,                  (5.13)
                                                                             F
                                                ∂t
                                                                                                  B
           where the term w denotes the moving mesh velocity vector [38], v F is the velocity vector of the fluid, f is the body force
                                                                                                  F
           per unit volume, and ρ F is the fluid density.
              The governing equation of the solid domain is the momentum conservation equation:
                                                              B
                                                       r  σ S + f ¼ ρ € u S ,                               (5.14)
                                                                  S
                                                              S
                                                             B
           where ρ S is the solid density, σ S is the solid stress tensor, f is the body force per unit volume, and € u s is the local accel-
                                                             S
           eration of the solid.
              The domains described by Eqs. (5.13), (5.14) are coupled in the aforementioned software using a displacement
           compatibility and a traction equilibrium described by the following equations:
                                                 u S ¼ u F ðx,y,zÞ2 Γ F  \Γ S  ,                            (5.15)
                                                                   wall  wall
                                            σ S   n S + σ F   n F ¼ 0 ðx,y,zÞ2 Γ F  \Γ S  ,                 (5.16)
                                                                       wall  wall
            where Γ F wall  and Γ S wall  are the boundaries of the fluid and solid domains, respectively, and n S , n F the corresponding
           outer-pointing normals. Eq. (5.16) is an equilibrium condition between both domains Γ F wall  and Γ S wall  on the boundary
           surfaces. Because this condition is applied in weak form, the grids between the two domains can but are not required to
           match. For establishing the equilibrium, a mapping equation is provided:
                                                          Z
                                                               S T
                                                             ðH Þ M sf τ f   dS,                            (5.17)
                                                  F S ðv,pÞ¼
           where M sf is a mapping operator used to interpolate variables at the solid and fluid nodes or vice versa [38, 39], F S are
                                     S
           the solid nodal forces, and H the interpolation functions of the solid elements.
              Cardiac cycles of about 1 s were discretized in time steps of 0.0001 s. To dump the effect of initial transients,
           three complete cardiac cycles were computed and data from the last one was stored and postprocessed. Because



                                                       I. BIOMECHANICS
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96