Page 393 - Aircraft Stuctures for Engineering Student
P. 393

374  Stress analysis of aircraft components

              Example  10.2 that for moments about the centre of symmetry





              Therefore, taking moments about the centre of symmetry

                    100 x  lo3 x 600 = 2qI2 x 600 x 300 + 2(qI2 - 43.8)600 x 300
                                    + (912 - 76.65)600 x 600 + (q12 + 32.85)600 x 600

              from which
                                          qI2 = 62.5N/mm
              whence

                        q23 = 19.7N/mm,  q34 = -13.2N/mm,    q45 = 19.7N/mm
                        q56  = 63.5 N/mm,  q61  = 96.4 N/mm

              so that the solution is almost identical to the longer exact solution of Example  10.2.
                The shear flows q12, q23  etc. induce complementary shear flows qI2, q23 etc. in the
              panels  in  the  longitudinal  direction  of  the  beam;  these  are,  in  fact,  the  average
              shear  flows  between  the  two  sections  considered.  For  a  complete  beam  analysis
              the above procedure is applied  to a series of sections along the span. The distance
              between  adjacent  sections  may  be  taken  to  be  any  convenient  value;  for  actual
              wings  distances of  the  order  of  350mm to 700mm  are usually  chosen.  However,
              for very small values small percentage errors in P,,l and P2,2 result in large percentage
              errors in AP. On the other hand, if the distance is too large the average shear flow
              between two  adjacent  sections may  not  be  quite  equal  to the  shear flow midway
              between the sections.





              Aircraft fuselages consist, as we saw in Chapter 7, of thin sheets of material stiffened
              by large numbers of longitudinal stringers together with transverse frames. Generally
              they  carry  bending  moments,  shear forces and torsional  loads which induce  axial
              stresses in the stringers and skin together with shear stresses in the skin; the resistance
              of  the  stringers  to  shear  forces  is  generally  ignored.  Also,  the  distance  between
              adjacent stringers is usually small so that the variation in shear flow in the connecting
              panel will besmall. It is therefore reasonable to assume that the shear flow is constant
              between adjacent stringers so that the analysis simplifies to the analysis of an idealized
              section in  which the  stringers/booms  carry  all  the direct  stresses while the  skin  is
              effective only in shear. The direct stress carrying capacity of the skin may be allowed
              for by increasing the stringer/boom areas as described in Section 9.9. The analysis of
              fuselages therefore involves the calculation of direct stresses in the stringers and the
              shear stress distributions  in the skin; the latter  are also required  in the analysis of
              transverse frames. as we shall see in Section 10.4.
   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398