Page 199 - Applied Process Design For Chemical And Petrochemical Plants Volume II
P. 199

188                      Applied Process Design for Chemical and Petrochemical Plants


          diameter. Kister  [94]  discusses the  effects  of  hardware   Pressure: 1.5-500 psia (Note 1)
          relationships on spray and froth entrainment.           Gas velocity: 1.5-13 ft/s
            For sieve trays Kister’s [94, 1841 final correlation is for   Liquid load: 0.5-12  gpm/in of outlet weir (Notes 2,3,5)
          the Souders-Brown flooding coefficient and is essentially   Gas density: 0.03-10  lb/ft3 (Note 1)
          independent  of  pressure. The  Kister and  Haas  correla-   Liquid density: 20-75  lb/ft3
          tion: [94] [184]                                        Surface tension: 5-80 dyne/cm
                                                                  Liquid viscosity: 0.05-2.0 cp
                                                                  Tray spacing: 14-36  in. (Notes 4,5)
                                                                  Hole diameter: M1 in.
                                                                  Fractional hole area: O.OWl.20 (Note 5)
            Correcting for the froth-to-spray regime transition [94]:   Weir height: e3 in.
                                                                  NOTES:
                                                                  1.At  pressures  above  150  psia,  downcomer flood  is
                                                                    often the  capacity limitation. This limitation is  not
                                                                    predicted by the correlation. Caution is required.
          where [94]                                              2. At  high  liquid  loads  (above 7-10  gpm/in.),  down-
                                                                    comer flood is often the capacity limitation. This lim-
                       0.29 Af-0.791 dH0.833
          (hct  )water =                              (8 - 289)     itation is not predicted by the correlation. Caution is
                    (1 + 0.0036 Q-0.59  Af-l.”)                     required.
                                                                  3. Equation 8-289 does not apply for liquid loads lower
              C~B Gfactor at flood, ft/sec                          than 0.5 gpm/in.  of weir  (35)*. For this reason, this
                  =
             Vflood  = superficial vapor velocity at flood, ft/sec, based on   correlation must not be extended to lower liquid rates.
                   net area, AN, ft2
                & = fractional hole area, AH/AB                   4. At lower tray spacing, entrainment flooding may be
               Ah  = hole area, ft2 (net)                           related to lifting of the froth envelope and to froth
               AB = bubbling area, column cross-section area less total   rather  than spray height. This correlation must not
                   of downcomer areas, downcomer seal areas and     be extended to lower tray spacing.
                    areas of any other non-perforated region, ft2   5. The correlation  does not  apply when  the following
               AN = net area (column cross-section area less downcom-   three  conditions occur simultaneously. (a) Ratio of
                    er top area) ft2                                flow path length to tray spacing is high  (> 3); (b) liq-
               hct  = clear liquid height at transition from froth to spray   uid rate is high (> 6 gpm/in of weir); and (c) fi-action-
                    regime, in. liquid.                             al hole area is high (> 11%). Under these conditions,
               dH  = hole diameter, in.                             entrainment flooding is related to vapor channeling
                 S = tray spacing, in.                              and vapor cross flow rather than spray height.
                n = a parameter in the spray regime, in.
                u = surface tension, dynes/cm
                p~ = liquid density, lb/ft3                       Fair’s [183]  design procedure  to establish an entrain-
           p~ or p~r = vapor density, lb/ft3                    ment flooding condition or “point” is as follows: Design
               QJ  = liquid load, gpm/in. of outlet weir length   Procedure (From Fair, Reference 183, by permission)
                                                                  The design method presented in this article is best sum-
            Kister and Haas [184] recommend using 25 dynes/cm   marized by a stepwise procedure:
          in Equation 8-286 when the actual surface tension is z 25
          dynes/cm.  This correlation is reported  [94, 1841  to give   1. Establish liquid and vapor flow rates and densities.
          better  effects of  physical properties, and  predicts  most   Obtain or estimate liquid surface tension. If  condi-
          sieve and valve tray entrainment flood data to d5 to 20%,   tions vary  significantly across the  tower,  apply  this
          respectively.                                             method  to  each section of  interest wherein condi-
            Kister and Haas [184]  analyzed sieve and tray data as   tions can be considered constant.
          earlier described [94] and then related their results to the   2. Calculate the flow parameter, FP = L/G
          application for sieve and valve trays.                  3. Estimate  the flood point  from Figure 8-137, which
                                                                    accounts for liquid flow effects and is a ratio of  liq-
          Recommended Range of Application. The Kister and Haas     uid/vapor  kinetic effects  [79].  Flooding velocity  is
          [I 841 Flood Correlation (used by pmission, Kister; H. Z.,   obtained from
          Distillation Design, McGrawHilZ, Inc., 1992)
            Flooding mechanism: Entrainment (jet)  flood only
            Tray types: Sieve or valve trays only               *References in ( ) are from the original source.
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204